Search results

Have you ever seen a 'teenage boy' who gets pissed and aggressive when someone talks or looks at them funny? Trust me, they exist.

That is the defenses case. He believed in his mind he was in fear of his life. The law says you must aquit in that sense, the end. The case is so very simple. Was the use of force justified for self defense? Yes or no? Was he getting beat up? Was he on his back? Did he sustain some...

You think his boyhood college pic and the pic of him shirtless looking up at his both look the same? There is a reason the media got blasted for that you know?

Ok, but I don't recall the detective getting up on the stand saying he had no reason to believe that JA was lying, as opposed to Det. Serino. Not really a good comparison.

What???

The big mystery to me is how did TM wind up near the T when he had a 4 minute head start on GZ and according to RJ (if you believe her) he was at or very near his daddy's house.

Yea he's sitting there but he wasn't actually his counsel at that time so he couldn't tell him what to say.

Like I said, it's possible but it's a stretch to think it. He never backed down from anything, even passed a test at the station to determine if he was telling the truth (don't think it was a lie detector test though).

Another example of how this case is basically a slam dunk appeal (IMO) if there is a conviction.

You have a link to back this up because I'm pretty sure I heard on WFTV that MOM was not his lawyer at that point in time.

MOM was not his lawyer when he did the Hannity interview. In fact I'm not sure he had lawyers by then and if he did, it was those two bumbling guys that he didn't communicate with anyway. When MOM took over, that was the last of the interviews.

It wasn't a smart thing to say. I don't understand though was he should have happy thoughts or remorse for TM when he thinks TM was trying to kill him.

What did he say to TM that is backed up by evidence that warranted him getting in trouble? TM never heard what GZ said on the phone.

To GZ, TM was trying to kill him. He probably still believes that to this day. If someone was raping you and you shot and killed them, I'd don't doubt you would feel justified as well.

He wants to be LE and is studying criminology so he should know the first thing about Miranda yet doesn't lawyer up. Sure it's possible, it's just not logical. I was shocked that even Jeffery Toobin agreed it was a stretch to think this.

This is exactly the states case, they say that TM is dead because GZ got out of the car. Ignoring pretty much anything else that happened after the 'get out of the car' part. Unfortunately for the state (and those who side with them), that is not the law in the state of Florida. The law says...

The following and running after TM is again, opinion that was not supported by any evidence in the trial. I wish the state has introduced something, anything that proved that GZ was doing all you say because this case would be a whole lot easier to solve.

What's the first thing someone says when a suspect/defendant lawyers up? He's got something to hide, that's hinky, etc. I can pull a laundry list of posts of crimes and trials on this forum where that was said. None of that happened in this case and yet somehow GZ is still this guy who had...

BBM I'm sorry, but this is not a given. This is a opinion and a hypothetical. There is no evidence that actually supports your opinion, outside of RJ and I don't think someone should go to jail based on the testimony of one witness who wasn't even there and who has credibility issues to...

In the words of MOM, you can't convict based on what if, maybe, suppose, etc.