Search results

Interesting analogy. In both cases there's a break with reality, in the case of Rambo due to the trauma of war, in the case of JA perhaps her psychopathy doesn't permit her to align with reality. It reminds me of the Japanese holdouts of WWII who continued to 'fight' the war in the jungles of...

Honor among thieves? She lives under controlled conditions in an environment stripped bare of freedom. Psychopaths do not generally like to mix with other psychopaths, they prefer to surround themselves with unsuspecting victims and easy prey, but she lives in a society of psychopaths. It's hard...

It's the job of the snow to fall, it's the condition of the ground that determines if it will stick. So her snow-jobs continue, as unlikely as it is to fall on receptive ground.

All in her own defense no doubt. I guess as a friend she falls short, but as a paid escort she takes her job seriously, and wears it well I might add.

She was little more than a prop on the courtroom stage who mined her supporters on social media for an angle which ended up a twisted circular path back to nowhere. No mitigating factor of record came from her.

Then there's the priming of social media with the distilled wisdom of the human race in support of her cause to the delight of her handful of supporters and the nonplussed stares of the general public.

It would only have been impossible if he gave in to her irrational demands, which he didn't, which is why she became hostile towards him and why he found it necessary to ignore her after a certain point. IOW it was for her own good, of course she is incapable of comprehending that. All she...

Arguments on appeal are inherently weaker with a LWOP sentence than in a DP sentence. With the DP, even the slightest error becomes a matter of life or death. With LWOP it becomes a much lighter weight on the side of the plaintiff: was justice served? What additional expense in terms of both...

Nurmi's simple defense for his alleged hostile behavior towards her during his representation would be it was necessary because she relentlessly tried to inject herself into the process as co-council if not lead council, attempted to veto or micro-manage his strategy once she had agreed to it...

All it means is she can try to convince the COA that she didn't get a fair trial - and it's all NURMI'S FAULT!!! - nevermind that she went on a media blitz by her own choice both before and between the trial(s) with her feigned innocence and calm conviction that 'no jury will ever convict me'...

If she did, she would have had access to unlimited state funds for unlimited numbers of appeals for an unlimited amount of time until her sentence was carried out, which would have been after all the attorneys involved, the judge on the case, the entire current COA, all law enforcement involved...

Too bad. And she already had a call in to Troy Hayden for an interview and free makeup.

Just because the author doesn't know the specific circumstances doesn't mean it's 'mysterious' but it seems to me that's the actual basis of the claim. The fact there is no elaboration of what makes the circumstance 'mysterious' indicates it's a claim based on nothing. Mr. Arias had kidney...

Surly her main concerns as well, only in reverse. (ground up cheetos and just the right amount of water makes a rad lipstick. It started in cell block 'D' and spread from there.)

Good question. He has a lot less to lose now, that's for sure. I suppose he could be sued by for those as well. She has a reputation to defend, after all.

Three traits I would use to describe Arias are psychopathy, narcissism, and duplicity. I see the last two in Nurmi. His book was a defense only if you believe offense is the best form of it. It was justification, not defense. Expending effort to cut everyone around you down to your already...

She may be too occupied with other talents which are more in demand. Besides, she may not feel like singing; she may be a bit disappointed of late in her Buddy on High now that the nights are not so Holy. She may keep her ribbon though, along with one or two 'Free Jodi' placards from brighter...

IIRC he was quite detailed and graphic about his private meetings with during the time of his representation. As I understand it, all interactions between attorney and client outside of the courtroom are considered privileged and cannot be revealed publicly without the consent of both...

I guess there isn't much to say that hasn't already been said. Many questions have been answered and I guess the biggest one of all, would justice be served, I think most would agree has been answered in the affirmative. I think the biggest draw of this case was the desire to see justice for...

Yes, that's what I"m talking about, if there's a justification to prohibit a post contractural relationship. I don't see that there is, but while the contract is in effect the relationship should be nothing but professional, ie no valentines and flowers - which is in effect what MDLR did, well...