geevee
Well-Known Stickie
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2013
- Messages
- 17,616
- Reaction score
- 16,549
True enough about how little time or effort her attorney put into the brief. Each charge basically cited (moot) code, then generically referenced alleged supporting facts " as laid out throughout." Didn't even bother to restate her whoppers or specifically attach them to the charges.
BTw. I never have put much stock in Monica's legal opinions, in part because she never seems to have the fortitude to clearly state then defend them. Perfect example-- her assertion that the does have a case (bull), but also that the must be able to demonstrate that Nurmi's bad deeds caused her damage (true) and that it is ridiculous for the to assert Nurmi damaged her reputation (more true yet).
On that last note , it's especially humorous & galling is claiming that Nurmi damaged her by saying she is mentally ill & had been a victim of child abuse. I almost feel sorry for Nurmi. (.......) Nah.
Hugs to you, sis.
I'm not a fan of Monica's either, she seems to want to stay in the safe zone, that's a little too wimpy for me, esp.considering she's an attny. How do you fight for a client when walking the center line?
I wonder; if JA is so adamant that she didn't agree with what Nurmi was using as her defense, what pray tell would have been her defense? Not self-defense, not mental impairment, not previous victimhood/child abuse - so what reason could she have had for slaughtering Travis that wouldn't have led to her conviction and receiving the death penalty?