Search results

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
  1. A

    Christopher Byers as primary victim...

    I agree. I do not believe that a knife was a weapon. I think that a blunt object (used for convenience purposes, i.e. on the ground) was the weapon of choice in these murders.
  2. A

    Terry Hobbs & Pam Hicks on Opperman Report

    Exactly. No one is above suspicion, not even Terry Hobbs. I agree that nobody deserves to be used as a scapegoat for this crime but it is fair that everyone close to the victims are thoroughly investigated. To say otherwise is simply ridiculous and ignorant. If a woman is murdered and she had a...
  3. A

    Timeline of Events

    Yes, I know where they all lived in relation to Robin Hood Hills. So what? That doesn't mean anything. Plenty of people who had MORE opportunity and MORE motive than the WM3 lived nearby as well. Stranger murders, which is what you are suggesting, are FAR more rare than murders by relatives of...
  4. A

    The Most Logical Suspect

    The most logical suspect is someone that knew the boys. A stranger, IMO, could not subdue them. A stranger attack usually requires compliance, and, based on the information given, I don't think these boys would have just sat there. These boys were not that weak. Stevie Branch was frequently...
  5. A

    Timeline of Events

    I don't know why Echols is your target. There are plenty of other people other than Hobbs who could have committed this crime as well, he just has the *strongest* motive. How about someone who lived near the Robin Hood Hills area? Or someone who lived in the apartments nearby? Still focusing...
  6. A

    The Hobbs Family Secret

    At least Damien replies with "yes" and "no" answers and offers to go into detail. Hobbs only replies with "I don't know" or "maybe." In interviews his body language also reveals how defensive he is (when he crosses his arms), and when he laughs (at inappropriate times) he's obviously trying to...
  7. A

    TH and potential evidence

    The Mildred French incident, IMO, was really really creepy. And didn't she also claim that he killed her cat?
  8. A

    David Jacoby

    I've never accused any parent, I simply stated why they should be looked at as suspects. And I believe you've already said something to that effect. And you're right, one can't get to the truth if you constantly deny it.
  9. A

    David Jacoby

    You may not have an issue with further investigating the murders, but you do have an issue with anyone who doesn't suspect the WM3. And where Echols lived is irrelevant as we have been trying to tell you. Because you refuse to accept the evidence which proves that the WM3 were not at the crime...
  10. A

    David Jacoby

    I am not going to accept what the evidence demonstrates because I don't believe that it's "real" evidence. You can talk about Echols and what you think about him all you want, you are entitled to do so...but I am not interested. I would rather focus on what seems the most plausible to me in this...
  11. A

    TH and potential evidence

    I would consider a "smoking gun" to be new evidence...a new DNA match...something that people missed before...not a rehashing of old evidence claiming to be new.
  12. A

    David Jacoby

    What relevance does Echols living in West Memphis have to the discussion now? Absolutely none. This argument over whether Echols did or didn't live somewhere will just make us go around in circles.
  13. A

    The Hobbs Family Secret

    Well you obviously feel you know enough to formulate an opinion. And an opinion is just that...an opinion. It's not fact. I don't know why you continually argue about sources and links. You can get your information from a million sources trying to corroborate something but that doesn't...
  14. A

    TH and potential evidence

    They are not the right ones. I respect your opinion but I don't think they are guilty at all. And this thread is about Terry Hobbs and potential evidence, not whether or not you think they are guilty or not.
  15. A

    FOUND DECEASED - WA - Lindsey Baum, 10, McCleary, 26 June 2009

    I'm aware that it might've had little or no relevance. I just posted it because it seemed like it was important but I guess, like you said, it was just an attempt to find someone who knew something.
  16. A

    David Jacoby

    Yes but I think he would have understood that it was a murder investigation. Any rational person looks at those closest to the victims, and Mark Byers and Terry Hobbs had a history of criminal negligence. It was only right that they were investigated (Terry Hobbs somehow got out of that...
  17. A

    The Hobbs Family Secret

    Reasons why somebody might give a false confession: •duress •coercion •intoxication •diminished capacity •mental impairment •ignorance of the law •fear of violence •the actual infliction of harm •the threat of a harsh sentence...
  18. A

    TH and potential evidence

    I wouldn't be shocked either. I wish they could get a search warrant on his house but by that time he'd probably already have it moved somewhere else.
  19. A

    The Hobbs Family Secret

    The blood on the pendant was unconfirmed. I don't know what you mean by "all the other evidence fibers and the confessions" because the evidence fibers did not link any of the WM3 to the murders. And those were clearly false/coerced confessions. I don't think supporters are "sure" of anything...
  20. A

    David Jacoby

    Byers was investigated more than Hobbs was, IMHO.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
57
Guests online
2,045
Total visitors
2,102

Forum statistics

Threads
601,794
Messages
18,130,006
Members
231,145
Latest member
alicat3
Back
Top