Search results

Possibly, but murdering your tenant is not a very tidy or proper thing to do. It would also discourage other people from renting the flat in future. If he wanted to "snoop", there was ample opportunity for that any weekday during office hours, when they would both have been out.

I wish I knew. It all hinges on having enough evidence of course - they may have a pretty good idea what happened, but there's no point in arresting or charging anyone if they don't have enough to make it stick.

Could well be, people often choose to be known by a second or third forename.

Application to convert no 42 into 4 flats granted in 2004. Applicant Mr P. Stanley. http://e2eweb.bristol.gov.uk/PublicAccess/tdc/DcApplication/application_detailview.aspx?keyval=I4E7P7DNZD000&searchtype=PROPERTY&module=

No. 42 has been occupied by members of the Stanley family since the 1930s at the latest. So I doubt that it belongs to the College. It has not been converted into flats. Although that may be now under way - that's just a guess given the evidence of building work going on. I think I read...

I don't think any details about this car have been made public. As far as I'm aware, the only 4x4 that has been mentioned is the one that drove into, then reversed out of, the golf club entrance on the Friday night. The witnesses described that as a light-coloured 4x4 type vehicle.

They haven't said that at all - they have just not ruled it out, which would seem to be the sensible course. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/police-have-not-ruled-out-sexual-motive-in-architect-murder-case-2175052.html

I agree with this, and it could be that they have a witness who saw her returning home. You cannot say they have "absolutely no evidence", we do not know what they have. Indeed we have only been told the names of occupants of (I think) three of the seven flats at no. 44 , nor of the people...