I think he came back from speaking to her saying he would go put her address into the sat nav. He walked back to the car sat and had a cig to take up some time. Went back saying he had done it and they were good to go.
With a back gate, perhaps?
I wondered whether PR and perhaps a friend/colleague had hit upon the idea of running a brothel and maybe he thought the young distressed, drunk young woman on a bench was an unhappy street worker and abducted her thinking nobody would report her missing.
Remember that his sister said he told her that he was giving LS a lift home from the bench and put her address into the sat nav. He said (according to his sister) that she made a pass at him and he pushed her away.
What I find really hard to understand is Why, If VT did it, did he return back to the UK? He knew the body had been found, knew he didn't have a solid alibi, knew he'd borrowed someone's car, knew there was CCTV on the bridge. He could have feigned illness or many other excuses to not return.
The original interior walls will be about 6 inches thick and very soundproof but as the property was converted into flats some of the interior walls may be thinner and breeze block.
Remember CJ is still a suspect. They may have released him before charging him in the hope of him tripping up and leading them to other perps. They may be holding off charging NUA because they are watching someone else.
Remember that the police knowing they have the guilty parties and CPS...
I don't necessarily think the missing 4 hours with GR are that relevant. They may have had words before he left and he might have thought she was having a party weekend to "punish" him. He may have spoken to CJ who probably mentioned seeing her leaving with another couple on the Friday evening...
I suppose this will seem to come out of left field but JY does look quite a lot like Claudia Lawrence. If the MAU is innocent is it possible that it is a serial Killer?
I can find a sort of connection to York but it is loose. There is a woman who lives at the same house as JY and MAU who shows...
That's true, although to be fair they have mentioned the DNA on her body.
It must be said that the forensic searches being carried out in the neighbours property appear to far outweigh those carried out at JYs. It would be a little extreme if it was just for a long disposed of pizza.
At the time that JY arrived home it was highly likely that she would have been spotted by passers-by and neighbours, quite possibly seen walking down the side of the building. No sign of her having entered her own flat would have put the other occupants of the building, very clearly in the...
The neighbour is a highly intelligent person and would realise that there would be witnesses to her buying the pizza and maybe even to her arriving at the house. He only had to go from the back to the side of the house so, late at night, he is unlikely to be seen.
Carefully placing these...
She might never have even gone home. Feeling bored, and the night yet young, she might have decided to go directly to her neighbours, bearing pizza and cider. The rest of the items, keys, shoes etc could have been put there later. He would have had the keys.
According to the Telegraph, she is helping police with their enquiries.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/8272836/Man-next-door-arrested-over-Joanna-Yeates-murder.html
It's really hard to find a motive, it's not as if you accidentally strangle someone. There was no forced entry so it's not as if he was lying in wait. Did she see him doing something he shouldn't? in the garden maybe? Did he he then just walk in through her then unlocked door and decide to...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.