Search results for query: *

I notice that among several suspiciously new and prolific pro-Letby accounts on social media, one madcap cuckoo amongst them is demanding that the doctors and DS Paul Hughes all serve life sentences! :rolleyes:

Again. Too vague. I've seen explanations for this "probe" elsewhere, but don't have official confirmation. But if it is the case these explanations are correct, then the above claims are complete BS.

Indeed. I don't trust her judgement at all.

My theory would be more developed if the Guardian's article wasn't so vague. Also, if he was harming patients a resignation would not end any investigation. One theory is that the complaint was BS and that is why the Guardian is being so vague. Get the innuendo out, but explain nothing. I...

You have no idea if he handed in his registration because the complaint was "serious". There is no evidence whatsoever that he harmed any patients. That Guardian article is so vague it comes across as something Maltin PR got them to publish.

So, I asked (several times) about what exactly this "complaint" was against Peter Hindmarsh, and the responses simply parrot the Guardian article, which does not elaborate whatsoever what the complaint was. It is vague as hell. You'd think from reading the article and the Letbyists it must have...

I've still got no answer about what exactly the "fitness to practice investigation" into Peter Hindmarsh involved. Various newspapers and Letbyists made a big fuss about it the other day...

Given that Shoo Lee claims he has witnessed a staggering EIGHT air embolisms in his career, I wonder if he believes the units he worked on should have been closed???

Oh my. I struggle to believe this comment is serious. This is where the Letbyists are - they think Letby was convicted on the basis she worked more than some other nurses. Then there is a another completely ad hom attack on Dr. Evans and his family. It is worrying to see the snide and...

What medical evidence are you referring to?

We have repeatedly asked for evidence of those other reasons. We're still waiting. Also, it doesn't matter how many times conspiracy theorists say the conviction is "unsafe", it isn't until evidence challenging the convictions is presented.

What on earth are you talking about? Questioning the mental health of one of the whistle-blowers, and then moaning about the cost of a trial that involved the murder of babies...

It was not established that he lied. It was not even established that he was mistaken. Letbyists have convinced themselves that he did. This is just another example of how Letbyists need to harass the doctors (i.e. the whistle-blowers), rather than the managers, and of course Letby. WTF? What...

Here we go with the nastiness again. When you can't outright lie and say that a doctor lacerated a liver, you have to suggest it could have happened in some alternative timeline or something. Bizarre reasoning. And medical negligence has the potential to occur in every hospital in the world...

All these reports about the complaint against Hindmarsh are all very vague...

Do you know what the investigation was about?

I think somebody reiterating the lie that a doctor lacerated a baby's liver is pretty nasty.

Nope. Wrong again. There is no evidence that any of the theories and distractions you put forward caused any collapses or deaths. They also didn't start with looking for a serial killer - that is a nonsense soundbite put forward by Letbyists. It was a year from the first collapses/deaths that...

Er, but they haven't. Don't get caught up in the Maltin PR-backed hurricane of conspiracy theories and false claims that made you believe that.

So, in the past 24 hours, various Letbyists on here have regurgitated various unfounded and debunked claims, including: 1. The rota/chart is "cherry-picked". It isn't. 2. A doctor lacerated the liver of a baby with a needle. He didn't. 3. There were suspicious incidents left off the rota...