Search results for query: *

Yeah - that's a rather strange accusation, consideration the same people will often criticise the doctors for not doing enough. Which is it?

What deaths are you referring to? No, it wasn't.

What are you claiming "casts doubt" on what was originally portrayed?

Quite a few of them were saying "Letby will be freed very shortly." Anyway, here's Nadine Dorries yapping that somebody is blocking her from visiting Letby.

Some of the responses from the online Lucy Letby fanclub are deranged. I see Peter Hitchens has a new article out brimming with complete guff. John Sweeney and Phil Hammond also doubling down again. They've doubled down so much you need to include the "E" (exponent) symbol in the result.

Riddle me this. The people who insist Letby was a "scapegoat" to cover for hospital mismanagement, now seem upset that the hospital management have been arrested! :D

Just to highlight the idiocy of some of the commentary surrounding the Letby trial, I have just seen a clip of Julia Hartley-Brewer interviewing Mike Neville, a "Former Met Police DCI". About 2 minutes in he says, quote, "...one of the key prosecution witnesses, Dr. Evans, has gone back on his...

Phil has had a few minutes to ruminate on the news and tweet something out. He thinks the managers were arrested for "not spotting murder"...

Yeah. Hammond and the other Letby defenders have consistently ignored or tried to mitigate the senior management. Why? Because they were defending Letby and were in denial that she was harming and killing babies. Instead, their vitriol is aimed solely at the doctors and consultants who tried to...

Well, the likes of Phil Hammond are going down this route, but note, he seems to admit there was "deliberate harm", something a lot of Letbyists deny. These arrests are awkward for him and his fellow armchair sleuths, so naturally, he has to try and point the finger at the consultants...

Wonder what narrative the Letbyists will promote with these arrests? I bet these are the same senior management figures who did their best to defend Letby.

I wonder how Ronald McDonald and the Letby fan club will spin that. I guess they will just try to ignore it, and suggest it doesn't apply to Letby's trial.

What's really going on?

What doubt is "reasonable", here? I haven't seen any.

A secret? What are you talking about?

That Guardian article found some unnamed sources who made the claims. Who were these sources? For all we know, it could be any of the Letby defenders who are so annoying on social media.

The excellent Deb Roberts with an interesting story. [links to X/Twitter]

Has anybody watched that Australian 60mins documentary? I heard Neena Modi was involved with. That's a red flag.

I'm searching for any reason to take seriously your disputation of the evidence given in court. So far, no reason has been given. You admitted you don't care what was said in court, that you're not a doctor or any kind of medical expert, but are posting various arguments from personal...

Same with any other trial. Speak for yourself. But you admitted you're not a doctor.