No there isn’t Katy. When everyone else made mistakes in the notes, or omitted notes completely, that was accepted as a mistake on a busy unit. When whenever Letby did it, it was made out to be a deliberate falsification.
You continue to ignore one of the key points in the Baby E case, time and time again. The mother described this fluid as dark and dried, specifically not fresh, not bleeding. This was nursery 1, there was another nurse in there. You really think a serial killer would attack a baby’s throat (?) and then leave the evidence long enough to dry in to the baby’s skin, in plain sight of the other staff and anyone else who may wander into the ward? How long would it take, for bleeding to dry in? So when was Letby’s attack? 8pm? Left for all to see until 9pm? And then left again for another hour.
Do you at least accept that if the mother’s account is accurate, then she did not witness Letby “mid-attack” and instead witnessed events quite some time after “attack”?
Also very lucky for Letby to have known in advance that the consultants unusually would waive the need for a post mortem, despite this baby losing almost half of his blood volume. But he didn’t go into shock, no, apparently babies can survive perfectly fine with no blood, no, this was “air embolism”.
It’s ridiculous. Absolutely ridiculous. Would they ever in a million years have thought this baby was subjected to a physical attack, were it not for Letby being there? Of course not.
