Search results

No one said that missing pants equals rape but if you were a detective called to the scene of a murder and the female victim did not have their pants on wouldn't you be more likely to think that she had been raped than if her pants were on? Or would you be more likely to think the murderer...

Maybe other body fluids? Or because they weren't with her when they placed her in the bag? That her pants weren't on when she was found doesn't outright say that she was raped, but it does make you wonder why they were removed? It does, however slightly, support TLM's story. I too...

I'd be afraid of TLM even if she only had a freaking q-tip. :) But I'm just saying that either way the cops would get to TLM via MTR through his direct or indirect statements, so she'd be after him either way. He would be the first person she would think of as the snitch, no matter what...

Reporters tweeted interpretations might not tell us a whole bunch, but they do tell us a bit, and it is interesting. And don't even gt me started about the glove.....:) ETA: that vid isn't in a real court, its on stage.

Well, that could be possible, but then why wouldn't he just tell LE what happened to begin with? Because he was afraid of TLM?

Okay, so he points to TLM/CM. That is not necessarily pointing to himself if he thinks that once LE talks to TLM she tells them that it was all her.

They don't have the time. If they could skip reporting on the testimony I'm sure they would report more about MTR's facial expressions. If they were able to they probably would have reported more about TLM's facial expressions. I know there have been people here that have expressed they...

That's what went through my mind when I was listening to the interview.