Interesting.
Whilst I don't know what the Ramseys intended to do, I am left feeling that they 'rolled with it' in the sense they opportunistically did whatever was believed to be in their best interests. They were hustlers!
I mean, who, barely half-an-hour after finding their dead little girl...
Indeed.
It's sort of expected that Mr Ramsey show his disdain for kiddie beauty pageants. I'll say this, kiddie pageants are weird -- little kids forced to act like sexualised adults is not healthy! More and more people are showing their disgust at them.
His words almost strike me as the...
Yes.
If you imagine the situation they were in -- that of staging a crime-- they had limited options. They couldn't leave the house and dump the body. So, they had to place it somewhere in the home.
The ransom note established the line of defence -- intruder(s) did it all. And if intruder(s)...
If the death was accidental (which I believe it was) then the motive obviously isn't about killing someone but rather what prevents the perps from not being honest i.e what stuff happened in order for them to not go to the police. Why?
I suspect there was co-operation of some kind on both the dressing/redressing of the body and the ransom note.
We know there is forensic evidence linking both John and Patsy to the crime scene in a not-so-innocent way. The father's fibres were found in her brand-new underwear. And Patsy's...
No. You said it had been 'discredited'. I asked you by whom and when and in what capacity? I wasn't aware the full truth of what happened was known.........
The thing is, just because YOU don't accept the sex-game gone wrong theory doesn't mean it isn't true. Until your theory (or any theory)...
The EA theory hasn't long been discredited. You're conflating your opinion with an absolute fact on the issue.
Who discredited it? Yourself? Law Enforcement? Was the culprit found and the 'correct' theory ascertained?
To accept that the head-bash was the absolute cause of death means we have...
I disagree. To say the garrotte 'could not' act as it was intended is a complex subject.
1. It might have been misused by the perpetrator.
2. It might have been used in a manner by the perpetrator not known to you.
The simple fact is, we don't know how it was used. To say it 'couldn't' do...
It is the little details however that sometimes tell the bigger picture.
By putting the 25th on the tombstone, it meant that the symbolic and holy time of Christmas would forever be associated with JonBenet. Just look at how JonBenet was buried -- in her tiara. Even at her funeral, it was all...
Thanks for the reply.
I personally disagree with that order of events. Whilst I try to look at other viewpoints, I'm still firmly committed to the strangulation first then head-blow.Of course, that's only my opinion and is not an absolute fact on the case.
Of course, I agree there was a sexual...
Excellent points.
Just to show I'm not a slave to Wecht's theory, I had a though regarding the head-blow coming first angle. And it was prompted me think quite seriously if that is what happened.
It goes like this:
1. JonBenet soils herself and Patsy has to go clean her up. She takes the...
Hi, long time no post.
I have tended to favour Dr Wecht's theory above others. Of course, I cannot support it with 100% certainty and I certainly don't claim to be the authority on this case.
I highlighted a part of your post. If JonBenet died to due to the sex-game-gone-wrong theory, then...
You are talking complete nonsense here.
How does fibres from Patsy's red top get on the duct tape that was placed on JonBenet's mouth. Oh, and Patsy said she didn't know of such tape. So we're left with a case of tape displaying Paty's fibres from the clothes she was wearing the night JonBenet...
Without being rude, but it is an objective fact that JonBenet's genital area was twice the size of a normal 6 yr old girl. Add in the eroded hymen, scarring, bleeding, birefringement material found, father's fibres in her underwear, clear molesting in the 7 o'clock position and it is manifestly...
"Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth." : Arthur Conan Doyle
Since no proof exists for an intruder in any way, shape or form, then it is impossible that an intruder did the crime. No sign of entry, no conclusive dna. Nothing to...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.