Come on.
People who are selected for jury duty have seen and know enough to know which answers to which questions will get them excused and which will get them through. One knows answering that particular questions truthfully would have gotten them excused. She also knew disclosing his murder...
Exactly. If you have to sit there debating within yourself whether you should or shouldn't say anything you know what the answer is. If she even did that.
lol.
Yeah, I don't buy it. We are all grown ups with logically working minds. We know what the question means. We know it doesn't mean have you seen this person's face on a park bench or on the evening news? There was one juror, who made it to deliberations, IIRC, who had seen Juan quite a...
I was perusing the q and a thread and here was AZL's explanation of the question posed;
"Really, wow. Yes, that would be a big deal--jurors are always asked in voir dire if they know the attorneys or have had any prior experience with them. I had a potential juror once who was CEO of a company...
She was aksed if she knew any of the players from this trial. And she said nothing. She is a liar. If I did what she did I would expect to be called a liar too.
We can try and play semantics. We can try and pass the blame around. But it is a straight forward question that seems pretty easy to...
She was absolutely asked this question. I remember one juror was excused for knowing Jennifer Willmott. They ask everyone for this very reason, there's a strong potential for bias. Juror #17 knows what she was aksed and I just don't believe that she does not remmeber Juan. I really don't. You...
Based on his interview with Jen Wood, he didn't seem that troubled by Dr. Fonseca or her attitude. Some of the other jurors might have been, including excused juror #3. But not the Foreman. It was a good interview though. He really got it.
I place no blame on the state or the judge for not crossing her in the beginning. There was nothing to cross her for. You don't cross someone off for cause for having DV in their past if they say they can remain impartial about it. It's their word and you have to accept it. I don't think Juan...
The sheriff also said at the time that they have received no reports of credible death threats and still no word yet on that. I doubt she is receiving much in the way of actual death threats. It's just drama. SSDD. Cry victim. I hope you choke on a chicken bone does not equal death threat. The...
Christ. This sounds even more forced than the first time around, not even kidding. Her talking about the Flores interview and the way she backtracked through her half hearted tears "I wish I could take that-well there's a lot of things I wish I could take back-but that's one of them."
How not...
Exactly. We can't truly know for sure but that is the impression I got from the foreman's interview with Jen Woods. I Don't think she was making a genuine effort. I also thought it was interesting how the foreman said they'd look at a piece of evidence and all agree on what it was EXCEPT for...
To be honest, it sounds to me after the other jurors complained she wasn't really deliberating she came back and decided to give the impression thst she was deliberating and considering things and maybe explaining herself a little better, but not really, and without any plans on changing her...
I tend to agree. I think the little pictures that are getting out might have been an embarrassment. OR it could be that they've been quietly monitoring it and putting into her little binder of disciplines. Give her enough rope, right? And now that sentencing is under way they are releasing the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.