Ya know...I'm okay with that. Fonseca wasn't on trial and if he thought she was not a problem, that's his right. The important thing is he didn't buy the defense and he had Jodi's number. Even if he thought MF and Geff made sense in their testimony from a psych viewpoint, he did not believe any of what they testified to applied to Jodi. So, it's all good.
Cliff notes:
The jury foreman’s take on the experts (from JenTrialDiaries’ interview):
http://thetrialdiaries.com/exclusivethe-foreman-from-the-jodi-arias-trial-speakshear-his-story/
Fonseca:
1. gave fascinating insight into Travis Alexander and Jodi Arias’ relationship.
2. she was reasonable, impressed him she didn’t use notes.
3. “Fonseca came across as truthful,”
4. he felt Fonseca held up well under cross
5. found her testimony of “lengthy but humanizing.”
Geffner
1. “Dr. Geffner had shockingly great qualifications”
2. came across very professional
3. “he seemed like an all around funny guy”
4. did show a pattern of the alleged physical abuse by Travis (he came to disbelieve this later on)
5. on Geff, round 2: “Seeing Dr. Geffner back on the stand didn’t do the defense any good”
DeMarte
1. thought she was “very well spoken”
2. he noticed how much JA disliked DM
3. thought she held up very well under cross
4. convinced the foreman there was no physical abuse
5. thought she was “diligent and knew her stuff”
The *advertiser censored* Parade
1. “the *advertiser censored* was just a non issue.”
2. thought the forensics and software testimony was interesting, but the *advertiser censored*- not.
3. ’ The slime misconduct allegation about Flores viewing *advertiser censored* on T’s HD “raised an eyebrow,” but JM successfully rebutted the allegation.