Search results

A comment about peoples' suspicions of the "friends" cooperation or participation in searches... HT, JW and DR have all participated at one point or another in volunteer searches. HT and DR have spoken on camera to news media. JW has spoken to LS's parents. I have seen no report that JR, CR or...

I have speculated about this as well, but believe the only times this person would show up on the timeline are: - at JR's, both earlier and later - possibly traveling from JR's (or some other location) with LS to the bar Given the reports of Smallwood witnesses/cameras and MB's statements...

I share this suspicion, though I similarly have little to base it on. My speculation is that JW may well engage in the "soft" drug use that is common among college students, but does not "party" as that term is often understood by young people (i.e. use cocaine or equivalent). I could be...

One possible correction re JR's - I too believed that MB was among the group there, but subsequently have gained some doubt on this point - it may have been just LS, DR, JR, and CR. My assumption has always been that there was drug use during this time, and that this may have been the purpose of...

I believe her Mom is referring to people who are not POIs or the persons POIs have named, all but one or two of whom have been questioned at one point or another by LE. LE has described interviews with a large number of people.

I've never had difficulty with this concept. Consider: http://cdn.kysdc.com/files//2009/08/ludacris-sideburns.jpg

Because the camera does not cover the area in which she was located, or covers it only intermittently and not at the time she was there.

What did BPD confirm again? As far as I can tell, all they have confirmed is that the individual on the last video containing LS, at 2:51AM, is known to them. I think there are few who doubt that individual is CR. While there may be a mystery man, I don't believe BPD has ever confirmed that...

Sorry for being unclear. I meant that we've probably seen the same things on these topics, and share the same uncertainty about the actual facts.

I've probably seen nothing about the timing, about which I'm similarly uncertain, that you haven't. I don't think I've seen anything special about the content, either, only that both CR and JR were confronted.

My recollection is he said at least three, and perhaps four or five. We don't know that he has any basis for anyone other than MB and JR - my impression is that he was taking the position that none of them were involved (implying that there must necessarily be a third person, if not more). It's...

Who says they are main players? The only reason we know any individuals' names is because they were named by attorneys and those who have spoken to the media. LE has never specified a name.

Attorney Chapman reports the call, or at least DR's representation that there was a call, as well - http://www.indystar.com/article/20110614/NEWS02/106140348/Interviews-Spierer-s-friends-family-continue

It's my understanding that JW and friends confronted CR and JR on the (day of the) 3rd, probably after not finding LS in her apartment. When the guys she was with the night before say they don't know where she went, and her roommate tells you she never came home, the police seems clearly where...

My 2 cents on the "mystery man." First, what I think is an accurate recitation of facts: - Witness claims seeing LS with mystery man on or around the steps at 10th and College at precisely 3:38AM - Precise timing of witness account is reasonable given that there is a large clock immediately...

I addressed this 2 or 3 pages back - it was 2 weeks prior to the statement to the media, in mid-June, and 3-4 days prior to the events. There is no inconsistency there whatsoever.

At least as of 6/10, they were not sure they had identified all POIs. As of 6/22, there was perhaps one or two secondary tier individuals they had not interviewed. I'm not sure they've id'd everyone.

It was four days, is my understanding. The two week time period refers to the time between the Indy 500 and when the information was supplied to the news media.

It is my impression that Chapman does not represent DR in this matter, only in an unrelated one, though he has spoken to DR about it.