Search results

I believe Judge Gull gets to decide if that happens. She'll say no, and the trial will go on as scheduled. IMO.

I can't even imagine how these parents must feel. Not only the grief of losing a child, but the utter shock at how it happened and by whom. Who would ever think that asking a college friend to babysit for date night would result in intentional homicide? It doesn't even sound like she "lost her...

RSBM This makes a lot more sense than allowing inmates (at any level of jail or prison except maybe death row) to keep Discovery in their cells. Although, maybe since RA was in solitary confinement for over a year he was allowed since he didn't share a cell and no other inmates would be...

After I heard about paper having drugs on it sometimes, I wondered if he was doing that hoping to get high. Maybe he thought (or someone told him) the paper had drugs on it? Or maybe what he ate wasn't Discovery but actually WAS paper with drugs? IMO MOO

I'm not implying it was done secretly. I thought I remembered this was procedure because of certain types of drugs being smuggled in on paper.

That is indeed the reason she provided in her very brief response/ruling.

Didn't someone(s) employed at/by the prison go through every page and make copies of it first? I thought I remembered that.

Regarding your bolded statement.....I have not heard anything, from anyone, that convinces me this is true. Especially not before he received the Discovery and/or heard others (i.e. the guards who copied all of the Discovery) discussing it around him or directly TO him. This is my opinion. I...

The word "maybe" could also be used by someone who had been so beaten down (figuratively), emotionally/mentally tortured, that they started to actually believe that "maybe" they actually did do it. Not knowing what's even real anymore. IMO MOOOOOOO

Hopefully only the ones that are recorded will be allowed, not the hearsay ones. IMO MOO

I was looking for the exact wording @iamshadow21 posted, which includes the word "maybe." I wanted to read the context. It's impossible to know, though, from this transcript whether Harshman meant "RA maybe said...." or "RA said 'maybe'..." We'll have to wait for trial. IMO MOO

See below. Ahhh, that's it. Thank you! I misremembered the word "might." It was "maybe." Thanks!

It's not in those links. When I search for the word "might," it comes up 4 times, but not what I am looking for. "Abby" doesn't come up at all. "May have" comes up once.

I'm trying to find the document/transcript where RA said/confessed he might have killed Abby. I think I read it here yesterday, but it's not in this one. Anyone know where to look?

I can't answer that question, but just because the judge has issued her opinion about the theories doesn't make them any less believable to people who have believed them all along, I would imagine. She has said they can't come into the trial, but that ruling doesn't make it FACT that they are...

Without the benefit/allowance of leading questions in the actual trial, I think the jury will be less-than-impressed by all these "confessions." Do we know if the State has tried yet to get Dr. Wala banned from testifying? IMO MOO

His wife and mother gave him the cold shoulder and refused to communicate with him? Please cite your source.

I don't think he will, but if he does, they better not accept any plea that doesn't name the other actors involved. IMO MOO

Absolutely. I've never followed a case so divided, and usually the jury goes how public opinion goes. I predict a hung jury on this one. There simply isn't enough (that we know of yet, anyway) to convict. We'll be at this for years and years and years. I fear there will never be justice for...

Thank you for bumping. This one has bothered me for years!