Thanks to you OP websleuthers for your commentary and allowing me to catch up. I can't believe I missed the proceeding after the long wait. Haven't been on here since the main trial but pleased to see old crowd still in attendance :-)
Is this supposed to be the Judge's last case? If the State does intend to appeal, I wonder if they have chosen not to indicate this during sentencing to allow the Judge to wrap things and exit proceedings without further ado.
I don't disagree with your description of Pistorius at all, but don't feel the hate some do :-)
I'm not judging anyone's reactions on here, especially those who have suffered DV. Was trying to relate my own experience of having watched the trial unfold.
Sorry didn't have time to articulate...
I might be in the minority here, but during sentencing, I felt like a voyeur for the first time during the trial, and uncomfortable as a result.
I should state that I believe Pistorius shot Reeva in a rage, and must face the consequences of his actions, and these have to be a lengthy stretch...
Oh FFS, of course he's going to say that re. the money. It's either genuine, or it's to impress the court. The defence can't prove it either way, so why state it.
Pardon my french, but what a total load of old bollocks.
The police thought it looked like a DV when they first attended the scene. Roux's spin is making my blood boil.
Seriously? No criminal pathological background in the offences he was charged with?
The speedboat, the speeding in cars? The gun offences? FFS. What do all the events he was charged with indicate to her?
Roux: What were your future prospects for making money from Pistorius?
Witness: Bright.
Roux: What does this have to do with his sentencing?
Witness: Sweet **** all.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.