LemonMousse
Former Member
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2014
- Messages
- 939
- Reaction score
- 0
Couldn't get in here earlier -- maybe too much action on the server!!
Anyway...
ROUX:
1. hit below the belt/cheap shot bringing up "suicide," as in "if you toss him in prison and he kills himself - which will be likely - his blood is going to be on your hands.
NEL:
1.He said something like, "Society; it's what we want." Actually, theoretically-speaking, Vermeer had a valid point when she said that sentencing can't be about what society wants but about what's in society's best interest.
2. HOWEVER, Nel again mentioned that if society doesn't get what it thinks is justice they'll take the law into their own hands. (Masipa, did you see those 5 HUGE guys sitting in the back row two days ago? That's what I'm talking about.) Maybe Nel was matching Roux but flipped. If you don't put him away he may be killed on the outside and his blood is going to be on your hands.
3. What was his comment about when he said, "'Dolus Eventualis' (long pause as the phrase hangs in the air) ... lawyers will be debating that for days..." a. An appeal is coming? b. We're debating whether we will appeal? c. If we don't like the sentence we'll appeal? d. Other?
4. OP, if home incarceration would be "staying in a luxurious house," at which phrase Lois then shakes her head "No, No" ( WTF? Yes, yes!)
5. He's making great points but if I filter them through JM's view that it was an ACCIDENT, he didn't MEAN to do it, he didn't know she was there. ( Incorrect, yes, but thats what she seem to think.) then she won't agree with Nel at all.
I'd appreciate any comments/thoughts on any/all of the above.
THANKS!
My thoughts and comments?
i agree with every word.
<not helpful>