Yeah I know Meticulously...I'm sick and tired of that footage too but there are elements of that footage that suggests Jane's "relationship" with MM was something more than it has been represented to be. Just picking it apart to evaluate that suspicion!
Thanks No name and Innerchild for your insights! Innerchild you did some great work there sussing out Red Dot Man's movements..There's more to that than I'm willing to say and I suspect the man inside by the stairs is also Red Dot Man, shortly before he exits and heads towards his...
Hi Noname..the stills shown were taken from the Haleyjane version. Some (most) I have had to enhance to direct posters to the particular person to watch.
If you want, I can do the same for you privately!
Hopefully these shots might explain what I'm trying to get across....Follow Mr Red Dot on the footage..see how he interacts with Jane...how Jane watches him then turns to watch him as he returns from the Gugeri St direction
Now that's a better likeness..
Here's his rap sheet..sorry for the long read!
Keating was born in 1959 in New
South Wales and had a juvenile criminal record in New South
Wales.
His first offences, serious offences, in Western
Australia were in 1977 when he was 18 years of age. On
11...
I don't suppose we will ever know for sure! It would be interesting to see what Trevor Dunen said about that in his book.
I'm attaching an article about Felicia Wilson..not sure why..there's a vague similarity albeit a decade earlier...
Further to your post,
TITLE OF COURT : COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
HEARD : 3 NOVEMBER 1999
https://jade.io/article/141592
Excerpts from Hearing
The applicant was presented in the District Court on an indictment containing 34 counts. These were counts of aggravated sexual penetration...
The following question was asked by a poster from this site -
https://aussiecriminals.com.au/convicted-of-serious-crime-list/comment-page-1/
February 12, 2012
Hi
I am trying to find information on a serial rapist from the 80s in the Perth area he was convicted on 16 rape charges and...
Regardless of how the article is interpreted, VC's murder has been solved and clearly BRE wasn't involved!
Now if you want to do some real sleuthing...follow Mr Red Dot..do it frame by frame. Check out his body language and Jane's body language!
In 1988 when detectives showed the kimono in the media, they had no idea who killed VC. They were clutching at straws when they suggested the kimono, which was dropped at the Huntingdale scene, was somehow linked to the murder of VC! The only commonality was that they were both sexual crimes...
Sorry InnerChild but that's a close to fiction as you can get!
1.BRE's DNA was not present at the VC crimescene
2.In 1988 DNA was not being used as a investigative tool in criminolgy..which might explain why the kimono was so carelessly manhandled without any thought of preserving such...
IF police planted the DNA, there is only ONE crime scene...and that is in the lab! If police hadn't planted the seed pods in the Lloyd Rayney case, we probably wouldn't even be having this conversation.
I have to say I agree with most of what you say CSK?..I say "most" because I believe there is more compelling evidence in that footage and I also think we were given crap footage on purpose as a previous poster has eluded to seeing a much better quality version. I think the mystery of Jane's...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.