Search results

So, are you insinuating that only eye witness and actual video of a crime being committed are the only possible pieces of direct evidence? If you are, that is not correct. If that's not what you are saying, then I apologize.

Lol....I've done it plenty of times. No worries

I'm not local....never said I was. The phrase "vomiting the crime" was suppose to say "committing the crime"....darn auto correct :) I was being sarcastic in response to people commenting that the perp took off the mask to reveal themselves to MB when committing the crime so she knew...

So law enforcement told you what they're thinking? Not really the forum for out of left field speculation and posting as fact.

????? Are you local?

<modsnip>. Your "legal terms of art" are correct. However, it is not black and white as you try to portray. There are instances where the same type of dna/hair/fingerprint found might be considered circumstantial in one case and direct evidence in another. ie...man rapes wife...if his...

I only did a quick search, so nothing I say can be considered fact, but there are chartered trips that don't have a "set" time...ie. you set the time you leave and return. Although I am far from what one would call a fisherman, I do know dusk is a prime fishing time. I admit maybe you know...

I sure hope so too!! I would think they do, but nothing about this case seems "usual" so maybe this will end up being the invisible man...sure hope not and that justice is served.

I understand the difference. What I am saying is they very well could have dna, hair, etc, just no match as of yet. When (if) they ever get a match, that would be direct evidence. I very well could be wrong (I have been once or maybe twice before ;)) but if I had to bet, I would guess they do...

Not at all. LE has not released any info about anything, but very possible (I would say better chance than not) they do have some direct evidence.

Yeah...perp went thru all that trouble making the whole disguise, just to take it off when vomiting the crime.

Wow....read into things too much? Suspicious that BB doesn't mention publicly that his wife went to bed early? Also, when used Tasers eject hundreds of confetti like pieces of small paper, identifying the taser. So almost certainly no taser used, and if one was, LE can trace very easily.

No need to advertise an award, if they already know who is guilty. Take it for what its worth, but my guess is LE knows who the perp is....just still gathering evidence until an arrest is made.

You're kidding, right?

Correct, but if the test came up as animal blood, it's a moot point. And yes, in certain situations, a lab can and does rush tests.

They knew within 20 minutes of getting the shirt if it was human blood or dog blood.

LE stated 5'8"-5'10"

Exactly, because there's no chance LE is just saying that for other reasons.

Didn't think about that. But if MB's blood is there, won't be much they can do to explain that away.

Obviously, what you state is all possible. What we are saying is that when you haven't checked in in almost 2 years, and you do check in from out of town for 1st time in almost 2 years the day b4 your wife is murdered, it is suspicious. There could be a million valid reasons he did it, we just...