Nope. Not saying that - If she threw rocks at me or hit me or attacked me with a telescope without provocation
Well I disagree, you get someone in the eye, you're going to do some damage. I don't really know what went on in the flat, the recording is ambiguous. If a woman threw a drink at me...
You understand just because a woman is throwing the rocks doesn't mean he can't be injured. See my earlier post. Have 7 separate scars on my body from "harmless" women hitting and throwing things at me whilst working as a bouncer and event security. If she threw rocks at me or hit me or attacked...
If the jury believe WW had assaulted GT, then he used reasonable force in restraining her and locking her on the balcony, the nearest door to him at the time. His safety takes priority over hers.
What was he mad about? Why did he have her by the throat? Why did he lock her out on the balcony? Because if she didn't hit him then what was he mad about? Why did he want her to leave when initially he wanted her to stay?
Just because of the big discrepancy in size, it doesn't mean she can't injure him. I'm 6'2 and the worst injury I received in all my years working as a bouncer was from a highly intoxicated woman, no more than 5'2. I gently escorted her to the door, the more she resisted, the more I tried to...
It's a very good question. I'll have to mull it over. I don't know. You would think, considering her behaviour throughout the night she would have got more aggressive after being locked out.
It's completely speculative. It sounds like she's being choked, but it also sounds like she's gagged. An audio recording isn't going to be sufficient evidence to confirm something like strangulation without corroborating evidence such as markings/damage to the victim's neck. And the pathologist...
Do you think he genuinely thought she would jump off or attempt the impossible, climbing down from the 14th floor - pretty much the same as jumping off.
My sentiments exactly. I'm not sure if it was ego or ambition, but a great disservice has been done to WW's family by bring this to trial. The only reason I can think they conjured up the murder charge, is to hope if they overcharged the defendant, the jury would be more likely to find him...
No, she was aggressive and violent way before it got to that point. 1.03am: Female: “Shut up or I will beat you up. You look like Sam
1.14am: Female says she is going to go vampire on his *advertiser censored*. Conversation about Reza. Male: “Stay right there.”
1.15am: Female: “You are...
And? She either attempted to hit him with it or did hit him with it, it's largely immaterial. She was the initial aggressor, hitting him with no provocation as maintained by both the defence and the crown prosecution.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.