Search results

I hope her only practical option for employment is to work for Cheney Mason. The cocky finger-flipper deserves her. Karma.

Yes, I never came back to reply to that but I agree. I couldn't remember exactly what reflections were seen in that particular photo at the time. With that said, I also had to agree the photos were taken from a closer distance than I originally expected, given the obstacle posed by the ravine...

FWIW, the last time TM's plane was tracked on FlightAware, it returned from Orlando to CA via Baton Rouge, LA on July 19th: http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N950KA

The only thing I've seen TM do is act as a decoy. Perhaps the story about her being in CA is to take the heat off her in Columbus.

The photos have been studied by serious people on both sides of the argument as to whether it was staged or not. At this point, it's not definitive, one way or the other. Somebody sold some photos. It could have been a greedy pap who wanted to keep all the money. It could have been a greedy...

The problem is, people are listening to NG and others, who don't have the first clue where she is, and drawing conclusions that aren't supported by what little evidence we've seen. The only place we know she's been is Columbus, OH, and we don't know for certain she's not still there. I have...

Everyone assumed she left Orlando with TM, yet she showed up in Columbus, perhaps on the plane with the golfers that left earlier the night of her release. Where is the evidence that she has been anywhere with TM, other than just speculation?

The "f" stands for felon. Six times.

Please post the flight log evidence that TM flew her to Columbus and then later picked her up after the shoot that Sunday and "returned" her to CA. Last time I checked, his plane hadn't left the airport in CA since the last time it returned from Orlando to CA the day of the phony sighting of KC...

There are possible ways to find her without it being staged, and certainly without HER knowledge. That's my point and it is yet to be disproven with facts.

I've photographed critters with a lot keener senses than KC without being detected. I'm pretty sure IF any good photographer knew where to find her and wanted to "shoot" her without being seen, they could and would. What happened here remains to be seen but I don't wish to belabor the point...

It wasn't confirmed. The THs are extracting numbers from their posteriors and trying to make them sound like facts. They know less about the facts than any reasonably informed WS reader.

Most seem convinced it was staged with her cooperation. I remain unconvinced. Even if she saw the camera, she wasn't necessarily in on it. But it's certainly possible and perhaps likely it was staged. I'll stop beating a dead horse, as we'll probably never know for sure.

No, she provided nothing to back up the claim. As usual.

This certainly suggests the photos were taken from a closer distance than I expected. I'm still not buying 20-30 feet, but perhaps 20-30 yards. Close enough that it would be difficult for her NOT to see the photographer. Thanks for providing this additional evidence.

Thanks. I've got to get some sleep. I'll check back, tomorrow...

True enough. But I've shot video of wild game with a partially rolled down window, hiding in the background on the far side of the vehicle. When one is in another dimension like that, one is much less obvious. That's how I would have approached it, but who knows? Maybe someday the...

While I consider whether a polarizing filter would work, consider this: If these weren't paparazzi, but hacks from the defense team who needed to set up and shoot multiple closeups in a quiet neighborhood, would they have a polarizing filter?

I'm not new but I don't post enough or have any authority to say you're allowed. I'll see if I can see the ravine from Google streets. Not doubting your word, I just want to see distances and cover. Could someone at the end of the street, say in the backseat of a car with tinted windows be...

Did you take any pictures?