Search results for query: *

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/19/world/europe/austrian-man-girlfriend-death-mountain-hike-guilty.html?unlocked_article_code=1.NlA.dp6L.cRj3bnry5BTJ In the end, the judge found that Mr. Plamberger was largely responsible for Ms. Gurtner, saying his mountaineering skills were “galaxies” away...

Not hearings, but unless complex case is granted, the filing and disclosure deadlines are. Government Disclosure due by 2/24/2026. Defendant Disclosure due by 3/3/2026. Motions due by 3/10/2026. Responses due by 3/24/2026. Notice of Intent to Call Witness due by 3/24/2026. Response to Notice of...

Here are the prosecution's motion to designate the case complex and the defendants' reply. GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TODESIGNATE CASE ASCOMPLEX UNDER THESPEEDY TRIAL ACT OR, INTHE ALTERNATIVE, EXTENDDATE FOR DISCLOSURE OFDISCVOVERY DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TOGOVERNMENT’S MOTION FORCOMPLEX CASE...

Yes, YOU are saying it, still, in this same post even. The statutes don't say it, you only claim they do. Wrong again. That code defines interfering and intimidating as: (2) Interfere with.—The term "interfere with" means to restrict a person's freedom of movement. (3) Intimidate.—The term...

Still doesn't make it missing from my post. And what crime is it relevant to anyway? I didn't know they were they charged with trespassing.

Yes, IF, and protests don't necessarily do that. So, again, it's incorrect to say protesting at a church is a federal crime.

Nope, that's irrelevant to my post.

Thank you for quoting laws that show you are wrong. Nowhere does it say that protesting in itself is a crime. It says certain actions are crimes, but not protests alone, since protests don't necessarily include those actions.

Nope, it does not say a protest is a crime. If so, please cite specifically where it does.

What law what?

He absolutely does wait. They arrived at the church at 22 minutes, but then they circled the block to wait. Alleged victims you mean. But yes, he is trying to keep the protest a surprise. The protestors wanted to do a surprise protest, no matter how imprudent or abhorrent that may be to...

Cite the federal code then that makes protesting at a church a federal crime. Protests can become crimes, but in general protests are not a crime in themselves.

He repeatedly said the protest operation was "clandestine." The protestors wanted it to be a surprise protest, so he did not want to give away their plan. Concealing the protest is not a crime. It's basically a news embargo, a standard journalistic practice.

And none of that makes what they did a federal crime.

That's a non sequitur then, since I didn't bring it up. I responded to someone else who claimed it.

Not in the least. His actions and words show he did not consider himself a part of the protest. Just review his own words in his video at these timestamps: 0:20 Speaking to an organization there that's gearing up to um for resistance and protest. [so he is not part of the organization] 8:03...

A private platform moderating content is legal and is not the same as government suppressing speech.

Because protesting and disrupting a church service is not a crime in itself. Nowhere does he indicate he is there to commit a crime nor that he believes the protestors are there to commit a crime.

He would say it because you never know who LE will arrest at a protest, even when you do nothing wrong.

The defense motion for grand jury transcripts even mentions this case on page 14: