Search results

It's rare for any overdoses to get prosecuted, but deaths of non-celebrity overdoses do get prosecuted as well. Here's another recent one in California for the death a gas station attendant...

But that shouldn't be relevant to the trial since he wasn't being tried as producer. And that evidence didn't prove where the live round came from, it just provided a possibility. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/judge-rules-alec-baldwins-co-producer-role-not-relevant-in-rust-shooting-case

I was speaking to whether the conviction is vacated over a violation, not whether there was a violation at all.

A couple of jurors were favoring Baldwin. But imo theur conclusion are premature, they don't know whether any coming witnesses could have persuade them otherwise. https://people.com/2-jurors-in-alec-baldwin-s-rust-case-speak-out-after-dismissal-8681200 In a conversation with The New York...

What's so stunning about it? Does it even matter?

That was addressed in the article: As the decision of a single district judge, Cannon’s opinion has no weight as precedent. It is not binding on any other court or judge, not even on other trial judges in her own district. The Justice Department could safely isolate and ignore it as an outlier...

The judge did say in her dismissal order that post-trial discovery of evidence under Brady requires a reasonable probability that the result of the proceeding would have been different. So, it's not just proving a violation, have to prove it would have changed the outcome.

The lying to the police charge does have up to 2 years penalty, so hopefully he gets that and is in prison while they prepare a retrial. moo https://www.legislature.mi.gov/Laws/MCL?objectName=mcl-750-479c If the crime being investigated is a felony punishable by imprisonment for 4 years or...

It's been decided, hung jury except for convicted on the lying and acquited on first degree. Too bad, hope they retry it. https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/wayne-county/2024/07/18/samantha-woll-jury-verdict-felony-murder-of-synagogue-president-michael-jackson-bolanos/74340878007/ A...

This is gross imo. The dismissal didn't exonerate him, he should be grateful there was the misconduct, which allowed him to walk away not due to the merits of the case. He should just keep walking far way from it.

The movie has such a dark cloud over it, seems like it wouldn't do well, but who knows? Lots of people did go see The Crow and Twilight Zone. But then those didn't have the star of the movie being a real life killer during the movie.

Quoting one more part: This is obviously so fake and makes me think of that Ralph Wiggum line on the Simpsons: Mrs. Krabappel and Principal Skinner were in the closet making babies and I saw one of the babies and the baby looked at me!

@Niner I had been looking for a good report on it, but most of them were skimpy on the details. This is the only decent one I found which has more details than I'm quoting here. https://www.courttv.com/news/scott-peterson-back-in-court-in-latest-attempt-to-clear-his-name/ Tuesday’s hearing...

This attorney says it would be quicker for Smith to refile the case rather than appeal. https://www.sidebarsblog.com/p/what-jack-smith-should-do-now I think there’s a better approach: don’t appeal. Instead, have the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida bring a new...

It is his job to get his client off any way within the law, but still it's unseemly to me. He could have brought it up before trial and then had a fair trial, which would have been best for the public and victim, but of course not for his client. He's not supposed to be looking out for the...

There's an afternoon update in the first link, they're still deadlocked and returning Thursday: The Wayne County jury deciding the fate of a man accused of killing Detroit synagogue president Samantha Woll ended its fourth day of deliberations on Tuesday still deadlocked, and will come back for...

The second link: The jury began this day as a “new jury,” and the jurors have been instructed by the court to start their deliberations all over again from the start. That means anything juror No. 3 brought to the room -- her comments, her vote, her view of the evidence -- must be tossed out...

All the lawyers in this case are so full of bs. That evidence couldn't exculpate HGR. Wherever the live round came from, she was still responsible for whether it ended up in any of the guns on the set. The same goes for AB's part in it. He just got lucky the prosecutor screwed up. (Not saying AB...

It would mean somebody else could be charged in addition to the ones already charged, but it wouldn't change any of the others' guilt or innocence. The others would still have the same level of responsibility or lack of.

https://variety.com/2024/film/news/kari-morrissey-rust-alec-baldwin-hannah-gutierrez-reed-1236072695/#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=17211441639895 The district attorney in Santa Fe, N.M., has affirmed her support for “Rust” prosecutor Kari Morrissey, after the manslaughter case against Alec...