Search results for query: *

Please cite any evidence that proves any of this. A "feeling" does not make a "clearly" met element. This is based on what exactly? You can't cite prior cases because this is the first prosecution of its kind. In fact, prior prosecutions of the Face Act for the abortion clinic clause show...

We have enough evidence to know that there are allegations in the indictment that are flat out false. Examples have been cited several times. For example, once AGAIN, from the indictment, bbm There is no super secret evidence or camera angle that is going to show that allegation is true. See...

I doubt the case was brought only because of Bondi. The whole DOJ leadership seems to be supportive. All the politically appointed leaders are for it, but the rank and file not so much. None of the career prosecutors from the charging division are involved in this case. The entire civil rights...

Simply interrupting a service is not a federal violation. Yes, that law has been cited many times. I will quote it once again here. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/248 The law prohibits anyone who: “by force or threat of force or by physical obstruction, intentionally injures...

That’s good because, like in the Lemon case, the church interference charge doesn’t fit. The state charge here was interference with religious observance. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/2019/cite/609.28 Very similar to the Face Act, the violation requires threats or use of force or...

Dr G Explains has a couple of good body language videos on the testimony.

This clip of the part where Garner questions GK on DARVO is fantastic. He's so flummoxed!

Emily Baker discusses what's going on in KR's civil cases.

Garner never did bring up GK's prior spying on his ex-wife. Maybe they felt it wasn't that needed, so why risk any appeal issue there. I tried to find more about the interview with the prior wife, and there was a hearing in February on it. Garner had given notice about this evidence, and Otake...

Would be perfect for KR, she would not have to go far to get her MJ drug hookup.

So, GK admitted he called Arielle a lying 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 and a 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬. Well then I have one message for the defendant. See You Next Tuesday! 😜

And the co-counsel backing him up sitting next to him has decades of experience. He made some objections yesterday during Otake's redirect. I thought Otake's redirect was very half-hearted, he sounded defeated. He only addressed some minor points, didn't even try to address the devastating...

He's even contradicting her about the ball grab. She says she used her right hand, but he says he hit her on his face left side (her right) with the rock while still latched onto his balls.

He says he only hit her twice with the rock, but their own expert says it was at least 4 times.

During her testimony, as soon as she started talking about the every other day demand, and what would happen if she refused, there was an objection and she couldn't finish what she was going to say.

Arielle did also claim in a TRO filed after the attempt, that he sexually abused and assaulted her in the months prior. However, the case docket shows an entry saying that: "THE COURT TO ALLOW THE EVIDENCE OF DEMAND FOR SEX BUT PROHIBIT THAT IT WAS COERCED."...

Brandi Veltri is a Chaffee County coroner. Not sure about Rebecca Burroughs Hauser, but maybe LE. She was on the old case's witness list too. The redaction is of her address, which it looks like they tried to also redact for Veltri but didn't complete. moo

I thought Garner's cross of the expert was satisfactory, and that's all he has to be today. The case is practically foolproof at this point, barring any weirdo misogynist incels on the jury. Happy to say I haven't seen much support for the accused in this case compared to other cases. About all...

GK reminds me of Sleeping With The Enemy without the charisma.