Search results for query: *

His video exonerates him. Disruption does not equal illegal. And Lemon has the right to comment his opinion about it as a broadcaster. Sympathizing or agreeing with the protesters doesn't imply his guilt about any crime in the least. LOL, such a strawman and a leap. I don't know this...

I personally do have problems with the whole idea of this protest. Mainly for me, since Easterwood was supposedly the main point, the most suitable protest location would be at his government office building. If you wanted church members to find out (and most didn't seem to know he worked for...

Here's an interesting filing. ORDER granting in part and denying in part 341 Motion to Modify Conditions of Release as to William Scott Kelly. Kelly is the very loud and combative protestor. If you haven't seen him, this is his video. Apparently, he had been given more release conditions than...

A couple of docket text orders were entered yesterday. They require the government to respond by March 27 to defendants' motion for grand jury proceedings and the motion for Brady materials and reconsidering discovery extension. So, hopefully we should have rulings on those motions soon...

RBBM Your bolded comment is irrelevant to whether he committed a crime. Do attorneys need to like their client's to work for them? We are not supposed to lock up or prosecute people for simply not liking them. I am personally not a fan of Lemon, nor do I think the protest was a good idea, as...

Today, Lemon and Fort and Beute (Lemon's cameraman) filed a motion for Release of Brady Materials and for Permission to File a Motion to Reconsider the Extension of the Discovery Deadline. Brady materials are exculpatory evidence. The whole thing is worth reading, so I am posting it all below...

One question that bugs me. Was there ever any point to the tweezers explained?

The agreement doesn't say whether she got counsel, but it does include a waiver of any objection over not getting counsel before signing.

I was looking through her civil cases and I don't see his family ever denying her account of the prenuptial agreement. You can't see discovery in court records though. She has about 5 outstanding civil cases, most were stayed pending the criminal trial. Interesting that Mrazik is the judge in...

Here's a pdf of all the state's closing argument slides. https://www.scribd.com/document/1013450058/State-s-Closing-Argument-Kouri-Richins

That was mentioned in one of the lawsuits. There were two retirement accounts his family alleges she stole, one for his grandmother and one for his mother, for a total of $55k. They were intended for the trust, but KR got payouts to her before the trust got it allegedly. They allege she did the...

From the article: So they did an indiscriminate cellphone tower search for anyone in that area, such overkill for a nonviolent incident. They pull out all the stops to run up the arrest numbers, recklessly, but then, as seen in the judge's order above, they slow walk their case to court...

If they did spring the prenup on her on the wedding day, that was dirty pool by Eric, putting her on the spot like that, without an attorney to review it. Doesn't excuse any of her crimes but that was a inauspicious way to start a marriage. Of course, there could have been shenanigans by KR...

Meanwhile, on Wednesday 3/18, the government filed a motion to extend deadlines, including extending discovery by 90 days and setting the speedy trial exclusion period to 90 days from the current 26. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72212459/391/united-states-v-levy-armstrong/ That was...

I am more interested to hear what his family has to say at sentencing, because I'm sure we haven't heard everything she's done.

GHB is a "date rape drug." But they dropped that charge for some reason. Does anybody know more about what happened there? The charges said she possessed it on or about January, 2022 and on or about February 11, 2022. GHB metabolizes quickly and can't be detected in blood after a few hours...

I didn't find 20/20 slanted at all. Her family and AS and Lazaro were on her side obviously, but the commentators were not. It would be wrong if they didn't include her supporters. It wasn't them being unfair to not have Eric's family on, they would have if they wanted to be on. They could be...

Yet another example that this is a sloppy and unnecessarily rushed prosecution.

Yes, that's right, this last order does say: I would hope the video will still be available.

The order on the motion to intervene withdrawal was filed and the 3/30 hearing was vacated. Next hearing scheduled is for motions starting 7/6 and has 5 days blocked off. Mar 19, 2026 Order Granting Motion to Withdraw Motion to Intervene.pdf (PDF, 194.35 KB)