Search results

<modsnip> Check out this article. http://fox59.com/2016/03/25/vigil-held-in-memory-of-shaylyn-ammerman-as-investigation-continues/ It says the name of Parker's mother and I think people may be thinking it is a different person.

Says 3 hours ago on Facebook. So around 3:30 pm today.

JMO. If it was a cartel or something similar, I think they would have taken IC in order to control her dad...to get him to do whatever it is they want him to do with assurance he will get her back safe if he follows through. To me, BC seemed very calm in the Mother's Day video and speaks as if...

So, if I'm reading correctly, this article says the gun smugglers are going to change their pleas from guilty to not guilty. Was SC going to testify against them???? But now he's not. Just a thought...

If there was strong evidence of sexual abuse of Isabel or the brothers, why wouldn't the guilty party be arrested? If it was a domestic violence thing, is it possible someone "rescued" Isabel from the situation (in my wishful thinking that she is still alive and well cared for)?

BBM. What about Starbucks? I haven't read here for a while...did I miss something?

IMO most of the time they would tell the truth to the media, but they are going to spin if they think it would be beneficial for some reason. And like I said, I don't fault them for it if it will help the investigation. It's just easy to see it happening sometimes, at least in hindsight.

I don't believe him. We know JB was a suspect at one point at least. And IIRC, according to IDM, LE went around the neighborhood asking if people had seen JB or Jersey. Whether he is still a suspect or if they have really "moved on," I don't know, but at the time that video was done, I don't...

A little too adamant IMO. IMO he is spinning. According to IDM, they went around the neighborhood asking specifically about JB and Jersey. Yet SY says (paraphrasing) they wanted to speak to him no more or no less than anyone else? And he didn't want to give out his name because he didn't...

Yes, thank you! :tyou:

Was the last search (performed by LE) for Lisa at the pond/lake close to Festival Foods? Does anyone know when that was? I'm trying to find it, but it is difficult. TIA

Were there other messages back and forth between them? The first part sounds like a response to something.

Yes, the phone call is one of the things the lawyers have pointed to as evidence DB and JI were not involved. If they truly thought Megan could have a connection (knowingly or unknowingly) to who took Lisa, why on earth would they not want her to talk?

Ron, If I remember correctly, you looked at Megan's phone records. Were there any outgoing numbers or incoming numbers she didn't recognize during late Oct. 3rd, early Oct. 4th timeframe? I'm wondering if whoever tried to call her number using Deb's phone may have used a different phone to...

I totally agree.

Yes. I mean that is one big reason I think they might be guilty. If they were still working with LE to do everything they could, I might be on the side of the fence that thinks they are innocent.

Oh, I misunderstood then. That is more concerning.

I see what you mean. I think instead of correcting the interviewer that only one boy was in his bedroom, JI just answers the question. I don't think they are very savvy at being interviewed, which is understandable. I guess I tend to give the benefit of the doubt on this kind of thing because...

Well I obviously don't KNOW what happened since I wasn't there, but the different versions I've read/heard don't seem to be mutually exclusive. I think it depends on how detailed they were in each particular interview and possibly even what details the reporters and/or video editors chose to...

I actually don't think the stories about that morning have changed in any alarming way. I think it depends on the details given or left out. For example when JI says he checked on the boys and then they (he and Deb) checked on Lisa, that is simply a summary of what I think probably happened...