Search results

The problem with Amy is that iirc, she was 14yo. So while we insinuate something, with dance lessons and cigarette butts, lets not forget that a post pubescent 14yo girl is nowhere near a prepubescent 6yo child. It's not the same thing and therefore likely not the same type of perp. Men who are...

Fair enough. However I fail to see how rejecting the most logical and probable explanation concerning the pineapple presents an alternative solution? The fact that you may desire an alternative solution does not redefine what is the most likely scenario with the pineapple. I would be genuinely...

There is a bowl with fingerprints left on the table. It contains fresh cut Pineapple. JBR is later found to have what appears to experts to be fresh cut pineapple partially digested. This is not complicated. What is interesting is to what degree you will spin in order to cloud the probability...

Because you state it emphatically does not make it so. The pineapple does indeed hurt them if they are trying to shield BR It does indeed help them if it takes the focus off BR. Yep, it's eaten pineapple - eaten after JBR walked into the house, just like BR said she did.

You cannot see a reason for them to lie about the pineapple because you refuse to consider the situation that would cause them to lie about the pineapple. If JBR was last seen by BR while they had pineapple/tea, then there would more focus on BR.

Agreed. I wonder if the fact that the R's won't tell us is the reason? What we need to keep in mind is that all these posts concerning the rope show nothing to say that the possible connection between the rope and JBR is not thru BR.

So if we do not know the nature of the material, then we at this point do not know the scarcity of the material.

Actually I did not. I believe this is a misunderstanding. Do you know the nature of this material?

Yes I know what it says. I just don't assume that you or I know what it means. Why did they not simply say fibers from the rope?

Scarlett, I do not dispute that the fibers are from the bag with the rope. I do not know, as I do not personally know the specifics. I tend to assume that they found fibers that were consistent with the bag fibers. What I also do not know is how many other items are made of consistent...

Actually, by your logic - no. What you have shown here- by your own method of evaluating fiber evidence is that PR and JR abused and murdered JBR using various items including the rope in a bag.

Actually, by your logic - no. What you have shown here- by your own method of evaluating fiber evidence is that PR and JR abused and murdered JBR using items that included the rope in a bag.

The fact remains that everything cannot be sourced. This fact is compounded when those who could possibly help source the item are uncooperative. Maybe PR could have sourced the bag, or maybe she could not. Even if she genuinely could not, that is not evidence that it was brought in by an intruder.

There is no requirement for law enforcement to evaluate every item in the house. There are not purchase records for every item in the house. Had the R's had their day in court, then the defense could have brought it up and leveraged the prosecution into explaining it, but sadly they were able to...

Actually I do not have a perspective on it. I have instead a simple desire to weigh fiber evidence uniformly. fibers of various types both sourced and unsourced were found. I don't find it surprising or anywhere near an exact science. In the event that the found fibers were indeed from the...

This imo is poor logic. The rope in a bag belongs to the R's or someone friendly to the R's unless it can be shown otherwise. Statements from R's concerning it are far from definitive. There is nothing inherently ominous about a rope in a bag. Most likely the rope in a bag has zero to do...

I find this curious. It's not like dna collection is very invasive or inconvenient, and to rule out possible sources is crucial to finding the truth, be it IDI or RDI.

Is the touch dna sample sufficient to possibly provide any information as to the race or geographic ancestry of the donor? In the event that it is, has this work ever been done?

Yep, then I would agree with you that AH should indeed have taken PR and JR to court due to fact that they were indicted.

Imo, the preponderance of the evidence shows that someone in the house is responsible. However, we both know that a GJ cannot indict "someone in the house". They must indict someone specifically. They cannot expect AH to get a conviction of "someone in the house". Imo, this is why there is no...