Search results

How can that be? A first caller? Before Emma? Wouldn't the dispatcher tell Emma a call was received prior and help was on the way? I listened to Emma's 911 call. It appeared to me that help wasn't summoned until Emma's call. Do you have a link for this first call?

I also have questions about this. I listened to the gf's 911 call. As she is in the park and on the phone with 911 you can hear the awful reaction of a male park go'er as he came across the body or the dog. But before that..............NOBODY saw anything or reported anything? Until AFTER...

Right. Why ask FBI and GBI to look at the case with new eyes if they knew who BG was? Doesn't make sense to me.

What if things went wrong and he had to flee without being able to retrieve the bag? Your scenario sounds very risky to me.

It would appear to me that the children would be impacted in a positive way if this is locked away for the rest of his life. Personally I think I'd be better off without a "Dad" who likes to masturbate in public and chase people though the woods with a hatchet. Parenthood doesn't make...

In Delphi, IN? On the day in question? Thousands?

I just don't see it but that's ok. There are other photos of DN that DO evoke a strong reaction in my eyes. It was always the clothing that was going to trigger an ID. You really can't ID anyone as to facial features in the released BG images.

From his court appearance it is quite obvious he does not want his face seen nor his voice heard. I have a feeling this is our guy. JMO

I haven't read anything that indicates DNA phenotyping can 100% definitively determine eye color. I keep reading the words "predict. Perhaps you have other info. I know DNA phenotyping produces a "snapshot" and not a sketch. I have a feeling the sketch was made from the snapshot. I...

I don't doubt that they WOULD withhold the sketch based on what social media has done with previously released evidence. I don't think it's beyond the realm of reason for LE to want to try to find this guy themselves without public involvement. If that's the case then they've hit a dead end...

IMO DNA phenotyping is largely responsible for the sketch. A "witness" coming forward after 5 months makes no sense at all. Turnaround time for a DNA phenotype sketch is 4-6 weeks. Most likely expedited in this case. That means LE has had this sketch for some time now. The announcement...

I'm sorry but I don't feel that way. When I heard a sketch was going to be released I wanted to see the FACE. The presence of a hat didn't distract me at all.

Law enforcement has barely said anything. It is straight common sense, based on known evidence, that brings many of us to otto's scenario.

My gut feeling is he's a loud-mouthed coward & a loser who isn't going to do anything but hide.

RL is not BG. Anyone with two eyes can see that.

She got the guy on video. I don't think it helps the discussion at all which platform she used. JMO.

That is simply not true and I wish it would stop being repeated. It was reported by media......true.......but they were quoting a "source close to the investigation".

The problem I am having.....and I'm sure LE as well .......is I can go to every county website in Indiana and look up the sex offender registry. When I do that I spot 10-15 guys in every county who could be BG. Of all the photos I have looked at not a single one has jumped out at me as "this...

I'd settle for one person in jail. That would end the rumors. Sgt. Slocum should be working on the next release of information to the public regarding suspect.

He didn't even reference the photos. Not sure how you can deduce that is what he meant.