You guys..I have posted this several times but am going to do so again as it is pertinent.
State v. Andriano, STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Wendi Elizabeth ANDRIANO, Appellant.
"We held in State v. Celaya that where the sole defense is self-defense so that the evidence requires either conviction or acquittal, any instruction on any other grade would be impermissible.  135 Ariz. 248, 255, 660 P.2d 849, 856 (1983);  see also State v. Wall, 212 Ariz. 1, 6, ¶ 29, 126 P.3d 148, 153 (2006) (noting that when defendant asserts an all-or-nothing defense, the record usually will not support the giving of a lesser-included offense instruction);  State v. Jones, 109 Ariz. 80, 81-82, 505 P.2d 251, 252-53 (1973) (holding that lesser-included offense instructions were not required where evidence at trial and defendant's self-defense theory presented an either-or jsituation requiring either first degree murder conviction or acquittal)."
Even in the unlikely situation where this Judge does allow the jury to consider lesser offences I have this unshakeable faith in JM. He will do everything to make this very smart jury understand what really happened. And the jurors have the option of felony murder as well. As JM said Travis would have considered JA to be an unwanted person in his house after the first stab wound.
Don't worry. Surrebuttal if there is one thing will not take long. JM will not let us down even if the unlikely event that lesser charges are an option.
