cindysnow3 said:I feel this case will IMO never be solved, due to the fact eveyone is so biased in their own facts about the case, they are not willing to look at the TRUE facts in it to base a case in the matter.
It doesn't help to have an entrenched position, cindysnow3. So I guess I qualify as a fence-sitter as far as this forum goes. The evidence really is inconclusive, although it must favour the RDI side, I think. The ransom note, for a start, reeks of Ramseys. As I say, the author seems to know John Ramsey and, judghing just from the nature of the note, it is hard to believe that JR doesn't know who the author is.
I've only just come to this particular case. I'm still dealing in first impressions. I start with the RN, just as the cops did that morning. At first, all they had was a missing child and a ransom note. I'm looking at it fresh from that point. A fresh approach necessitates a wide open mind on all issues. I must say I am surprised by the heat of the hostility towards the Ramseys in the RDI camp. There are minds that are really quite closed on this issue. I don't think it helps. IMO.