waltzingmatilda
Verified Insider-Roy Moore
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2008
- Messages
- 6,718
- Reaction score
- 713
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
IF TM was shot, while on top of GZ ,as the attorneys said yesterday I would think that GZ would have a lot of blood on him
Why the 72 hours? That's what I want to know? What do they need in the next 72 hours that they don't have now? George?
This entire deal with yesterday's press conference is mentally insulting.
Haven't talked to your poor, downtrodden, unjustly accused client in a day and a half........so you drop him?
There's something else at play here. You can count on it.
GZ's attys sent him a message during the TODAY interview that went something like this...
'George, if you need us, call us. If you don't need us, call us and let us know that too.'
So I guess they haven't heard from him.
moo
wm
it makes no sense that Mr Zimmerman's not-my-attys are still all over my tv and still stirring things up. In some ways it seems to me that they want a riot type situation
I will agree with Gregaros that the lawyers talking about GZ's mental state is very poor form. For two people that are seemingly supposed to defend him, they did more harm to his case yesterday than anything. Like Toobin on CNN said, why would they even need to call a presser, they could of just called the SP discretely and said they are off the case.
It begs the question, how much were they ever 'his' lawyers? Did GZ actually retain them? When they were going on these talk shows, were they speaking what he wanted them to say or were they just going off what they read in the media, similar to if one of us got up there, said we were his lawyer and started talking?
Something is not right, and this goes for the website too. I'm beginning to trust less and less what these two lawyers say, to the point where I'm starting to question how connected they ever were to GZ. Is the website truly GZ? We've only heard from them that it is.
I meant it in terms of someone asking if it could be considered aiding and abetting. I don't see how it could if they were giving the money to help with his defense, that is what his website says its for legal defense and living expenses.
Ima
This entire deal with yesterday's press conference is mentally insulting.
Haven't talked to your poor, downtrodden, unjustly accused client in a day and a half........so you drop him?
There's something else at play here. You can count on it.
...Now, however, it seems like they are still trying to woo him back so I wonder if George isn't in talks with a very high profile attorney and they are upset because he didn't sign the contract with them.