2goldfish
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2008
- Messages
- 3,979
- Reaction score
- 52
Is it reasonable to doubt that THE person telling law enforcement that they spoke with the (now proven deceased) child, is not in fact the child's KILLER who is trying to delay the discovery of such a fact?
NO way do I expect jurors to think any differently than I do myself. This case is gonna hinge on what is REASONABLE to doubt.
I'm glad to hear that this testimony from Casey will most likely be put in front of the jury to hear.
Why else would you falsely say you heard from a missing child, if you hadn't?
I sincerely hope that Casey is convicted, whether or not the death penalty is imposed.
<devil's advocate> if she were totally innocent, barring everything else we know, she still may have told this lie in a bid to keep them from placing the blame on her. </devil's advocate>
although combined with everything else we know, it kinda stinks. If she had been screaming and begging for the kidnapper to be found and then she still was looking suspicious I would feel that it was more likely. as it is...no.