2009.01.08 Two Hearings 11:00 AM and 1:30 PM

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
They are wanting to view the ones taken before the remains were removed fromt he crime scence, and the ones before the remains were cleaned (i think they do this). Like pictures of the remains with the tape on them.

Ughhh! Sure would hate to see those on the internet! Sad!
 
Conway is speaking

i hope they're speeding----lights on.

get her there!!!

i wonder if the family is on the way. it's not like they're at work or anything.:waitasec:

:cow:
imo
 
Judge asks if it is folly to make 7 copies and have them returned in 10 days. SA says, "Can I say I told you so later?"

Judge S is definitely sharing these concerns.
 
if certain people were just as concerned about PICTURES getting out to the public as to the JUSTICE that is deserved a little baby that was MURDERED


i would be happy

i think the murderer and others close to her are total JERKWEEDS and i hate all of them



:furious:

I agree with you too!
 
SA says the picture are disturbing. Says pictures of the skull as found and removed are disturbing.

Duct Tape?
 
JB is arguing about sheriff's dept having pictures of crime scene. state says pictures of crime scene are disturbing and they are the ones that need to be protected
 
JB says many other phtos exist - from other agencies.

Doesn't want defense to get blamed for this.

Pictures will surface - mark my words.
 
SA says the picture are disturbing. Says pictures of the skull as found and removed are disturbing.

Duct Tape?

So sad. :(

Jose saying, "If these photos get leaked, I don't want the finger pointed at the defense." :waitasec:
 
the whole thing is stupid
i dont want the photos out in the public either but for goodness sakes
people are more concerned about pictures than the freaking murder of a child

<---------------SPINNING LIKE A TOP
 
We should be discussing the contents of the hearing only - not personal opinion, rumors about Casey, nasty quips about attorneys or general joking around.

Just curious, and I'm not being snippy ... but where does it state that we can not give personal opinion in this thread?
 
JB says many other phtos exist - from other agencies.

Doesn't want defense to get blamed for this.

Pictures will surface - mark my words.

I agree, Potato, just a matter of time. Sickening!
 
Judge says there is good cause to restrict photos, trying to figure out how to do so.
 
judge said its good reasoning to restrict photos, just has to figure out how to do so
 
Could the judge just make a ruling where if anyone buys the photos they will be pushished. Say for instance People magazine runs them....they get in trouble?

I mean I know he wants to stop it before it happens, but still
 
SA motion granted, but Strickland does not know how he will do it yet...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
73
Guests online
185
Total visitors
258

Forum statistics

Threads
609,412
Messages
18,253,734
Members
234,649
Latest member
sharag
Back
Top