It is stated that it was not an accident. How do they know this? I don't think it was an accident, but I want to know what evidence they have.
Hoping this thread is OK-
A glaring omission is any forensic evidence as to how long they believe Caylee's body was in the woods.
No specific mention of Casey's fingerprints on the duct tape.
For some reason, I am stuck on this key that they found? What significance does it have in this case. It stated that they found a key on a keychain.
Did they have the diary forensically examined in order to determine the date it was written? Was the entirety of the diary released or just that one page?
Didn't they say they would be releasing lots more info in the next few weeks?
Also, the results on the duct tape were that there were NO fingerprints recovered.
I'm having trouble understanding this. It's like they're saying no fingerprints were found and those fingerprints, that were not found, did not belong to Lee, Cindy, or George. It's not computing for me.
The FBI doc lists the reference fingerprint copies for G/C/L. They may have never even been looked at once it was determined that no prints were visible on the tape.
I think folks are getting confused with the "exclusion" term used in the doc (as if those 3 people were excuded by method of visual comparison). The reference prints are available for exclusionary purposes. They weren't used in this instance.
It is stated that it was not an accident. How do they know this? I don't think it was an accident, but I want to know what evidence they have.
The syringe:
Had it been used?
Was the plunger fully depressed?
Were there results that determined what was in it?
Did it match either the contents of the liquid in the Gatorade bottle &/or the sediment in the bottle?