2009.03.10 - Hand Written Note From Tot Mom in Response to Pros. Motion

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
I think the correct legal name for this is the temper tantrum affidavit, short form. I have no idea what inquiry the judge will or won't allow at a hearing, but it does seem obvious the defense wants to ward it off. A brief with legal authorities might have been in order, but oh well. This filing seems a little deficient and wildly inappropriate, naming names and attributing personal motives with no proof, bringing up an old plea/immunity offer that has long since gone off the table. The "story" part in quotes is too cute, and doesn't address all the concerns raised by the state. The claim of innocence is sort of the same: she says she didn't commit the crimes she's charged with. It comes off pretty mis- or half-truthy.
 
Not so mind-boggling. KC does, what KC wants to do. Let's not forget that ridiculous, inappropriately timed and worded statement JB read (in the middle of traffic with cars honking) the day before Caylee's memorial. I refuse to believe that statement was JB's idea. KC is completely full of herself, and as dumb as a bag of hair. Putting her JB sock puppet on, is her only means of communication with the outside world. JMO.

Very much agreed that KC does what KC wants. Maybe her defense is planning on presenting that they have indeed met their obligation to explain and inform, but that KC is incapable of understanding. I just dont' know. This is really bothering me.
 
"Said Retainer Agreement does not contain any clauses or parts that allow or entitle him to any rights that would allow him to sell my "story" or that of my daughter, Caylee Marie Anthony."

But thats just JB, what if someone else does the selling?


5. There are no other Agreements selling my "story".

How about Caylee's story?
 
Not so mind-boggling. KC does, what KC wants to do. Let's not forget that ridiculous, inappropriately timed and worded statement JB read (in the middle of traffic with cars honking) the day before Caylee's memorial. I refuse to believe that statement was JB's idea. KC is completely full of herself, and as dumb as a bag of hair. Putting her JB sock puppet on, is her only means of communication with the outside world. JMO.


:woohoo:

What an idea for a PhotoShop guru !!

:woohoo:


I think the correct legal name for this is the temper tantrum affidavit, short form. I have no idea what inquiry the judge will or won't allow at a hearing, but it does seem obvious the defense wants to ward it off. A brief with legal authorities might have been in order, but oh well. This filing seems a little deficient and wildly inappropriate, naming names and attributing personal motives with no proof, bringing up an old plea/immunity offer that has long since gone off the table. The "story" part in quotes is too cute, and doesn't address all the concerns raised by the state. The claim of innocence is sort of the same: she says she didn't commit the crimes she's charged with. It comes off pretty mis- or half-truthy.

Bolded by me

Hopefully followed soon by a courtroom temper tantrum .... I'm wondering how long JB can control her behavior in court.
 
I think the correct legal name for this is the temper tantrum affidavit, short form. I have no idea what inquiry the judge will or won't allow at a hearing, but it does seem obvious the defense wants to ward it off. A brief with legal authorities might have been in order, but oh well. This filing seems a little deficient and wildly inappropriate, naming names and attributing personal motives with no proof, bringing up an old plea/immunity offer that has long since gone off the table. The "story" part in quotes is too cute, and doesn't address all the concerns raised by the state. The claim of innocence is sort of the same: she says she didn't commit the crimes she's charged with. It comes off pretty mis- or half-truthy.

My bold. Reading what you wrote there, amethyst, it struck me that she actually used the singular - 'crime'. Is she saying that of all the crimes she's charged with, there's only one she "DID NOT commit"? LOL

ETA: OMG as soon as I hit submit, it hit me that this could have been a subconscious confession!! Wow, I wonder.

Then it struck me what she said about how she's not going to allow LE/SA "trick" her into a confession. Good Lord - that'll be the next thing she and Baez whine about.
 
I think the correct legal name for this is the temper tantrum affidavit, short form. I have no idea what inquiry the judge will or won't allow at a hearing, but it does seem obvious the defense wants to ward it off. A brief with legal authorities might have been in order, but oh well. This filing seems a little deficient and wildly inappropriate, naming names and attributing personal motives with no proof, bringing up an old plea/immunity offer that has long since gone off the table. The "story" part in quotes is too cute, and doesn't address all the concerns raised by the state. The claim of innocence is sort of the same: she says she didn't commit the crimes she's charged with. It comes off pretty mis- or half-truthy.

Thanks for the morning chuckle, Amethyst--"Short Form Temper Tantrum Affidavit"!

The Temper Tantrum Affidavit (Short Form) is used in cases when you "get what you pay for" and allows sufficient space at the bottom for your jailed client to insert whatever wildly inappropriate statements your client chooses to make, including F-you's to the Court and State Attorney's office.
 
Thanks for the morning chuckle, Amethyst--"Short Form Temper Tantrum Affidavit"!

The Temper Tantrum Affidavit (Short Form) is used in cases when you "get what you pay for" and allows sufficient space at the bottom for your jailed client to insert whatever wildly inappropriate statements your client chooses to make, including F-you's to the Court and State Attorney's office.

LOL :dance:
 
Amen, Horace! Amen!
Casey Anthony shows her stupidity and her ignorance once again!
Who else would make such a comment towards the State Attorney?
This girl is truely a piece of work.:furious:

I'll take it a step further,
What other attorney would allow her to add that?
 
Thanks for the morning chuckle, Amethyst--"Short Form Temper Tantrum Affidavit"!

The Temper Tantrum Affidavit (Short Form) is used in cases when you "get what you pay for" and allows sufficient space at the bottom for your jailed client to insert whatever wildly inappropriate statements your client chooses to make, including F-you's to the Court and State Attorney's office.

Once you file this affidavit, you must accompany it at the related hearing by observing some other rules. Chew gum in court, if at all possible. Glower and smirk, and be sure never to address the court with even a modicum of respect, which is a rule of normal etiquette. Really, what is at issue here and is important for your attorney to reinforce for the world is that you are a petty person with antisocial tendencies. That should really help the case.
 
I wonder what the Judge is going to say about it on Thursday (right?). Wouldn't it be great if Strickland looked down his nose at Baez and spoke frankly to him about #7?
 
A motion is to allow a party to address a point of Law or a procedural query, to be answered by the Court. It is not to make personal remarks or "naners" at the opposing party.
If I didn't know better it would appear Baez wants a mistrial before it even starts.
Be interesting to see how Mr. Train Wreck handles this.
 
The Temper Tantrum Affidavit (Short Form) is used in cases when you "get what you pay for" and allows sufficient space at the bottom for your jailed client to insert whatever wildly inappropriate statements your client chooses to make, including F-you's to the Court and State Attorney's office.

Once you file this affidavit, you must accompany it at the related hearing by observing some other rules. Chew gum in court, if at all possible. Glower and smirk, and be sure never to address the court with even a modicum of respect, which is a rule of normal etiquette. Really, what is at issue here and is important for your attorney to reinforce for the world is that you are a petty person with antisocial tendencies. That should really help the case.

Also, ensure your attorney approaches the bench (without asking) and lumbers towards the Judge with a gait that would make a gorilla proud. Further, Short Form Temper Tantrum Affidavits are offered with the repeated legal justifications of "It's just not fair, Judge" peppered with liberal amounts of "ummmm".
 
A motion is to allow a party to address a point of Law or a procedural query, to be answered by the Court. It is not to make personal remarks or "naners" at the opposing party.
If I didn't know better it would appear Baez wants a mistrial before it even starts.
Be interesting to see how Mr. Train Wreck handles this.

No doubt he'll try to hug it out.
 
Thanks for the morning chuckle, Amethyst--"Short Form Temper Tantrum Affidavit"!

The Temper Tantrum Affidavit (Short Form) is used in cases when you "get what you pay for" and allows sufficient space at the bottom for your jailed client to insert whatever wildly inappropriate statements your client chooses to make, including F-you's to the Court and State Attorney's office.

LOL,:blowkiss:
 
Please correct me if i'm wrong:eek: j/k BUT, hasn't JB been blasting his mouth all over EVERYTHING for the past 8 months saying that KC will tell her "story" at trial. SO...imo.

They feel that they are being truthful because they will not profit off of "her story" at trail.

Once she is convicted, isn't it true that she can no longer profit off of her murdered baby?

Long story(no pun intended) short. KC/JB will not profit off of her story or Caylee's story, but it seems just fine to pay for a defense with money made off of selling her photo's.

Sorry to turn this into a rant. Yesterday, i laughed...needed it.Today, i am seeing the complete shisterness of it all...

ETA: while i'm on my rant...It seems like KC is really starting to feel out of control in her legal situation, and is lashing out. It does my heart good to think that she is miserable.She is boxing herself into a corner with her defense, and i think that's EXACTLY what she wants. She is tight with JB, but she can not like 7 other people giving her advise, when she know's best! She expects them to get her off... but she doesn't want them all given oppinions, after all they get in the way of Lik-Rish time...(incert sarcasam)... thanks for letting me get that out.
 
Not so mind-boggling. KC does, what KC wants to do. Let's not forget that ridiculous, inappropriately timed and worded statement JB read (in the middle of traffic with cars honking) the day before Caylee's memorial. I refuse to believe that statement was JB's idea. KC is completely full of herself, and as dumb as a bag of hair. Putting her JB sock puppet on, is her only means of communication with the outside world. JMO.
May I respectfully disagree. Casey doesn't have enough sense to tell Baez to go out and do a PC. Baez is screwing this case up big time. Or what to say. Do you think Baez would listen to Casey? Me thinks not. He's also too full of himself.
 
Please correct me if i'm wrong:eek: j/k BUT, hasn't JB been blasting his mouth all over EVERYTHING for the past 8 months the KC will tell her "story" at trial. SO...imo. They feel that they are being truthful because they will not profit off of "her story" at trail.

Once she is convicted, isn't it true(son of sam or something) that she can no longer profit off of her murdered baby?

Long stroy(no pun intended) short. KC/JB will not profit off of her story or Caylee's story, but it seems just fine to pay for a deffense with money made off of selling her photo's.

Sorry to turn this into a rant. Yesterday, i laughed...needed it.Today, i am seeing the complete shisterness of it all...
Son of Sam was revoked by the Supreme Court. So...... Casey can make money by selling photos of her deceased child to pay for her defense. She is/was the legal parent of Caylee and has not been found guilty YET. Can't wait for the hearing tomorrow.
 
My bold. Reading what you wrote there, amethyst, it struck me that she actually used the singular - 'crime'. Is she saying that of all the crimes she's charged with, there's only one she "DID NOT commit"? LOL

ETA: OMG as soon as I hit submit, it hit me that this could have been a subconscious confession!! Wow, I wonder.

Then it struck me what she said about how she's not going to allow LE/SA "trick" her into a confession. Good Lord - that'll be the next thing she and Baez whine about.

BeanE, I was thinking about the various comments that she has foreclosed any later claim of "accident," though I hate using that word, or mental defect/insanity. It's hard to think they were being that artful in writing this affidavit, though, except for the obvious "story" matter. But who knows with them????
 
BeanE do we know that for sure as I heard a couple talking heads say it must be true, otherwise JB would have been perjurying himself. :waitasec:

How could JB be perjuring himself? He didn't sign the affidavit????
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
86
Guests online
287
Total visitors
373

Forum statistics

Threads
609,415
Messages
18,253,757
Members
234,649
Latest member
sharag
Back
Top