butwhatif?
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2008
- Messages
- 3,598
- Reaction score
- 40
The difference is probably one being a woman and noticing something a little more than a man would.
LOL...aint that the truth!
But its the fact that their intentions for taking her to that area is what differs so greatly, along with whether or not medical staff were in attendance at that time that is the main issue at hand.
If the differences were about how many tears she shed, or if she slumped, or just sat in the chair, thats no big deal.
But one says that he was not supposed to let her see the tv in his original statement , and the other says she was instructed to take her there for that very reason.
One says no medical staff present, and the other says they were, but just assessing her from a distance.
Who do we believe?Even the video wont prove if they were assessing her from a distance,since the camera was on her, not them.
I think it should be determined by if notes were recorded on her medical file for the time in question.
Because if they werent assessing her reaction, there will be no notes. No notes means it had nothing to do with medical or mental health staff, thereby making it legal to be released.
JMO
ETA: I havent gotten through all the new depos yet, so these things may have already been adressed in them....so forgive me if i'm off base. Am waiting for tonight when kids are asleep so I can read them without having to stop to play blocks and applaud new ballerina moves by my lil ones.