Paintr
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
- Messages
- 5,964
- Reaction score
- 41
Isn't it strange that this is all 'junk' science according to Cindy A and Mr Baez when the evidence points to KC as the guilty party? I will bet a steak sandwich and 14 cents that there will be no defense protest on the tests released today.
If the SA tried to point out that even one test result did not entirely rule out the posibility of a match tying KC to a particular piece of evidence, Mr Baez would flood the airwaves with declarations of infallibility for the soil tests on KC's shoes and all other tests that point away from KC.
Of course, any test that points towards a guilty KC would STILL be 'junk' science. :waitasec:
If the SA tried to point out that even one test result did not entirely rule out the posibility of a match tying KC to a particular piece of evidence, Mr Baez would flood the airwaves with declarations of infallibility for the soil tests on KC's shoes and all other tests that point away from KC.
Of course, any test that points towards a guilty KC would STILL be 'junk' science. :waitasec: