hi, songline: trying to be devil's advocate here- there's a difference between a child being seen and then being absent, and just being absent...my school wants you to call in when a child is absent but to be honest, sometimes I forget, as I'm dealing with other kids, and sometimes leaving him with hubby as I'm rushing out the door to work...mean to call when I get to work but something comes up and I forget...(you know we can't count on hubby to watch kids and make phone call, lol!)...since when i do bring my kids, it's always directly into someone's care who is acknowledging receiving them (i.e. before-care where I sign them in) if they don't see them, they assume they are home with me (and do get annoyed if i don't send in a note the next day)...they would call on the 2nd day for sure if they don't hear anything...i don't know...we're in a small town where everyone knows everyone and i guess kidnapping wouldn't be considered unless the child was seen or acknowledged to be there by an adult, and then missing, such as what happened with kyron...i guess we do need to tighten up on this but i'm imagining many small towns are the same. but in kyron's case since he was seen already, it's really not acceptable unless the teacher specifically KNEW for a fact that kyron was going to a doctor's appt which does not seem to be the case...they should have called to verify why he wasn't there unless someone specifically told them "hey, he's leaving with me now...remember i told you he had a doctor's appt.?" i would never just take my child under any circumstances without catching the teacher's eye regardless of whether i had previously mentioned that i would be taking him...so in this case, i would consider it negligence but at this point, i'm not sure that part matters... only what was seen, not seen, known, not known would have relevance cause the rest is "shoulda, coulda" unfortunately...
ETA: by it doesn't matter, i don't mean it doesn't matter because there is some negligence and culpability there; i mean it doesn't matter as far as locating him now unless the teacher was somehow involved in the disappearance...does that make sense?[/QUOTE]
You totally make sense. If this parent/substitute teacher/ whomever told a child to calm down, and did nothin but left the room I HAVE NOT ruled out this person as a possibility.