agathawannabe
Member
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2008
- Messages
- 275
- Reaction score
- 0
IMO,there is NO way AB is not involved in at least the coverup. Too much clean up going on in the house, and not seeing Zahra?
In a word, NO. IMO.
He cannot narrow down when he last saw his daughter-HIS child. The one he was responsible for and had custody of.
that speaks to knowledge of the crime to me.
I understand where both of you are coming from, believe me.
At the same time, I figure if we've correctly deduced (with Railbugfreak's gracious help) that EB was able to hide an extra simultaneous marriage from AB for - what? - a year.. then maybe it's worth exploring the possibility she managed to hide a murder for a couple of days.
It's been a laborious sleuthing process for me to get to a point of even tossing this theory out for debate. But I feel like it does start to explain some things that didn't seem explainable to me any other way.
Think about the recent case politics in the media, too. (i.e. DP's off the table; NO, it's not; posturing by DA to rescind the deal possibly)
I think perhaps EB can't deliver her end of the bargain - without ratting out someone other than AB. And her goal in playing along with the deal was probably to bring up evidence she thought she could get AB implicated with (and get herself off light) - but, IMO, it hasn't worked. Maybe because she can't produce solid evidence that implicates AB.
(i.e. Did AB purchase a box of latex gloves somewhere? Is there any physical evidence connecting him? Is there even any circumstantial evidence? What do we really know?)
A lot of this involves "wait and see". IMO, the GJ hearing (scheduled tomorrow, right?) could be very telling.