Blaise
Member
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2008
- Messages
- 391
- Reaction score
- 0
I LOVE JUDGE PERRY!please don't tell my hubby! I love him too, BTW.
Justice is coming for Caylee!
I just wanna make me a Judge Perry / Jeff Ashton sammich.
Blaise
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I LOVE JUDGE PERRY!please don't tell my hubby! I love him too, BTW.
Justice is coming for Caylee!
Sorry to quote myself but I couldn't edit my previous post. The JibJab Motion was indeed already granted by Judge Perry on January 3, 2010.I could swear the Judge had already ruled on the JibJab Motion since the State didn't object to it during that particular hearing. Also, the JibJab Motion was not included in Mr. George's response. Me thinks the Judge made a slight error, because one motion that the State did object to is left out: The one about Cindy's MySpace posting.
I could swear the Judge had already ruled on the JibJab Motion since the State didn't object to it during that particular hearing. Also, the JibJab Motion was not included in Mr. George's response. Me thinks the Judge made a slight error, because one motion that the State did object to is left out: The one about Cindy's MySpace posting.
WESH presents it in their article as if both posts are included in one Motion/Order, that's not the case. IMHO they are simply mistaken and there is no ruling yet on Cindy's message.bbm
He did durig the hearing but now we have it in written form in his Order.
I still haven't seen the Cindy Myspace one that WESH mentioned and it's not included in the Diary of Days Order....
No jib jab video. Dang It was the judges Valentines Day gift to JB so he could feel the love while attempting to forge his expert reports. All MOO- he may ask someone else like the poor thwarted MrS to forge them for him
Can someone explain to me the one on the smell in the Pontiac?
:great: :rocker: :great:
I heart you, HHJP.
Can someone explain to me the one on the smell in the Pontiac?
Well, I absolutely agree with Judge Perry. Anything that relates to the murder of Caylee should be included. I can't believe Baez even brought up the jib-jab video. And considering the relationship with R was after Caylee was reported missing (I THINK), I'll give him that too.
Mel
When the A's picked up the car at the tow yard it stank. GA was afraid to open the trunk because he was scared it might be his dead daughter or grandaughter in the trunk. He found a garbage bag instead. The guy from the towing yard tossed the garbage bag into a dumpster and said something like there's the cause of the smell.
The smell didn't leave with the garbage bag however. The next day LE picked up the garbage from the dumpster to process it. Meanwhile CA and GA had gone on the media several times blaming the smell on the garbage bag, or more specifically invisi pizza they alleged was in there.
Now comes the defense (see how much law I'm learning haha) stating that because LE allowed the garbage to dry out rather than to let it rot, it's impossible for them to illustrate that the terrible smell was pizza and not a dead body to a jury so they want all mention of the smell tossed. That's their spoilation motion and the defense missed the deadline for submitting it by more than 6 weeks.
Here's the forensic report outlining the smell stuff, the SAO has to counter JB's motion. http://orlandosentinel.image2.trb.com/orlnews/media/acrobat/2009-06/47589408.pdf
Well, I absolutely agree with Judge Perry. Anything that relates to the murder of Caylee should be included. I can't believe Baez even brought up the jib-jab video. And considering the relationship with R was after Caylee was reported missing (I THINK), I'll give him that too.
So so glad the other evidence is coming in.
Woo hoo!
MOO
Mel
And the funniest part of all is that this is their big ammo, and the heart of their defense so far. This is their big motion, their big scientific report. :floorlaugh:
Don't have time to read all the motions...but what part of the TL motion was denied...and what part granted? TIA