2011.04.15 Sidebar Thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
darnudes said:
Didn't he say "crime"?

At the time I thought, oops, big mistake Baez. The SA's caught it as well, Baez then repeated that thought a couple of mins later.
Click to expand...

Yes -- he said "crime" -- something like after the "crime" had been committed.
 
One thing I was very surprised about- HHJP wanted the photo of Caylee that showed she had a bruise under her eye photoshopped or airbrushed, so that the Jury wouldn't see it. Yes, I'm sure JB will say it's prejudicial, but to me the photo is what it is and should be left that way. JB can always debate it in court, explain that what really happened (according to ICA of course) was that she walked into a table, and see if a Jury believes her. If she'd had bruises all over, obvious signs of abuse, would he have those removed too?
 
ZsaZsa said:
One thing I was very surprised about- HHJP wanted the photo of Caylee that showed she had a bruise under her eye photoshopped or airbrushed, so that the Jury wouldn't see it. Yes, I'm sure JB will say it's prejudicial, but to me the photo is what it is and should be left that way. JB can always debate it in court, explain that what really happened (according to ICA of course) was that she walked into a table, and see if a Jury believes her. If she'd had bruises all over, obvious signs of abuse, would he have those removed too?
Click to expand...

The SA wasn't using the photo to argue abuse, and they agreed that the bruise wasn't from abuse. So, I think HHJP wanted to make sure the photo wasn't sneaking supposition into the jurors' minds when they were supposed to get something else from it.
 
ZsaZsa said:
One thing I was very surprised about- HHJP wanted the photo of Caylee that showed she had a bruise under her eye photoshopped or airbrushed, so that the Jury wouldn't see it. Yes, I'm sure JB will say it's prejudicial, but to me the photo is what it is and should be left that way. JB can always debate it in court, explain that what really happened (according to ICA of course) was that she walked into a table, and see if a Jury believes her. If she'd had bruises all over, obvious signs of abuse, would he have those removed too?
Click to expand...

Meeee too ZsaZsa. I think that was absurd. IMHO ... and I love Love LOVE HHJP, I think he bends too far over to accomodate the defense to lessen appeal issues. I don't agree with it because I think there will be an appeal NO MATTER WHAT....so I say "man the torpedos, full steam ahead".
 
WhyaDuck? said:
The SA wasn't using the photo to argue abuse, and they agreed that the bruise wasn't from abuse. So, I think HHJP wanted to make sure the photo wasn't sneaking supposition into the jurors' minds when they were supposed to get something else from it.
Click to expand...

I wonder how they know it wasn't abuse? ICA is charged with child neglect amongst other things. We know she didn't care much for her welfare, letting her sleep in the same bed with boyfriends etc.
 
Patty G said:
I did!
http://www.youtube.com/Sierra1947
Click to expand...

Thanks Patty...I went looking for your videos!

I am watching Part 7
I can't get over Baez asking JBP about how the jury is summoned and his Motion to Advance notice coming up with excuse after excuse.

Now Baez is complaining about Advance Notice for Cost reason!! Really! Baez is the one who wanted this case moved out of Orange County and now he is complaining about costs...I am really beginning to think Baez does not want to get a Jury seated and get this trial underway.

I like what JBP said.."Hotels are very cheap there"
 
ZsaZsa said:
I wonder how they know it wasn't abuse? ICA is charged with child neglect amongst other things. We know she didn't care much for her welfare, letting her sleep in the same bed with boyfriends etc.
Click to expand...

I think the SA were just open to agree to that, since they have no proof and they have a bigger project in mind at the moment. And to save the photo for their main goal, they agreed to remove the prejudicial part.

It really wouldn't be easy to prove that mark was abuse - two year olds often have strange bruises, so that would distract them from keeping that photo (showing the shirt) in the evidence.
 
dog.gone.cute said:
I am seriously considering getting that thing that records your programs through the satellite system or cable system, and you can watch the show anytime you want to -- like when you get home from work or on the weekend.

I am not very "techy" and I do not know what these recording programs are called ... so maybe someone else knows the name ... I guess it is something like "tibo" ?
Click to expand...

TIVO. I have a DVR with my cable subscription, but I love to watch the hearing live from the courtroom. The InSessions and all of the other have too much commentary and too many advertisements! I have just got to figure out what I can buy that will let me live stream. I am serious that this keeps me up at night.....well not really, but I do think about it alot!
 
dog.gone.cute said:
I am seriously considering getting that thing that records your programs through the satellite system or cable system, and you can watch the show anytime you want to -- like when you get home from work or on the weekend.

I am not very "techy" and I do not know what these recording programs are called ... so maybe someone else knows the name ... I guess it is something like "tibo" ?
Click to expand...

There is something called "Slingbox". It connects to your cable box, and allows you to basically control your cable box through a PC or ipad... etc. It works great. Anything you can do with your remote, you can do from your pc. Then there are also just DVR or Tivo, depending on your area.
 
TotallyObsessed said:
I'm glad somebody else is worried about this! I am not supposed to live stream at work. I cheat sometimes. But I know I cannot LS everyday for 2 months! So........I am thinking about either buying an IPad or upgrading to a fancy smancy phone. But I don't know if either "media packages" will actually allow that much "media use", i.e., live streaming 8 hours a day for 2 months!

Help. Suggestions anyone?

ETA: I feel like a complete nut going into my local TMobile store and asking "can I live stream a trial for 8 hours a day?"
Click to expand...

Don't feel bad,I asked exactly that because I am going to be on a 10 day camping trip starting May 23 and was looking at options,I was told that it doesn't take much live-streaming to go over the limit and then it's very expensive after that.But that's in Canada,our cell and internet is expensive.
 
ZsaZsa said:
I wonder how they know it wasn't abuse? ICA is charged with child neglect amongst other things. We know she didn't care much for her welfare, letting her sleep in the same bed with boyfriends etc.
Click to expand...

Either Tony or Ricardo said they were there when it happened. I believe Ricardo.
 
Do we know if Amil or any other WS member was there today?
I'd like to know what ICA did when the photos of her, and then of Caylee were being discussed.
 
I believe that Amil was there today. Looking forward to her update as always!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Members online

... and 61 more.
Total: 560 (members: 62, guests: 498)

Online statistics

Members online
62
Guests online
498
Total visitors
560
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
608,149
Messages
18,235,296
Members
234,302
Latest member
TKMorgan
Back
Top