It's in the court records but the jury did not hear Fry connect the mac address on BC's laptop to the router. However there were only (2) 3285 routers and one is still at Cisco. GM testified that it has never been used, is still in the box on the shelf. These are $11,000.00 routers. The serial # of the router still at Cisco is the serial# on the Chicago printout. GM did not know what that printout was and it was never verified. The router (ending in H) was not on the printout yet people continue to say it is. If there were only (2) 3285 routers at Cisco and one is still in the box and on the shelf, that verifies (along with the laptop) that the router (ending in H) is the one Brad used.
I'll concede one thing, Kurtz did a good job confusing people which is his job.
err...GM took one home, even though he had no idea how to use it. Was there testimony one was still boxed and unopened? I don't recall that.
according to the chat, BC took home the other one but intended to return it as soon as the one he ordered came in.
He probably did return it (no evidence that he didn't), and who knows who else came along and 'borrowed' it? GM wouldn't know.