Well if JB were claiming to be sick and turns out he isn't - is that some type of violation? If there isn't then I guess he is really trying to shake things up and just set up situations where he will test the judge and see what the reaction will be.
All the judge needs to do is make a move against the DT that they can use to remove him, maybe including not allowing a sick DT to leave.
Just my 2 cents.
Did anyone catch that look ICA gave on the way out ..I got the look when she was going around table I marked the time on on Pic its looks like she said Thanks .. and the look is like either "Oh Well What are you Going Do" or "We will see"
http://www.wftv.com/video/27939403/index.html
It wouldn't surprise me if someone else has suddenly "pled guilty" to this, three ring circus and all.
OK. Looking at Richard Hornsby's most recent blog Could Judge Perry be wrong, Defense right?. In short he says that the Defense could be right about their argument over "piecemeal" jury selection and HHJP wrong. He cites Perry v. State, 675 So. 2d 976 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) as authority (this case, incidentally may be the "just one" which HHJP and AZLawyer wanted).
Anyhow question to the lawyers: Why are the DT taking this point now as an interlocutory appeal when they have already made their objection and (I assume) preserved this point for appeal? Surely it is better for the defense (or at least ICA) for the DT to get on with this trial, not piss off HHJP anymore than they already have and try this case to conclusion. Should ICA get acquited hoorah for the DT/ICA, if she gets convicted they have a good shot of getting the verdict overturned and a second bite at the cherry?
Could it be CM withdrawing and that gave JB a bout of the runs? CM discussed it with Casey... it is my opionion that Judge Perry looked disgusted at someone at the defense table.
It wouldn't surprise me if someone else has suddenly "pled guilty" to this, three ring circus and all.
It wouldn't have to be to appeal to a higher court if they wanted to appeal the manner in which HHJP was conducting voir dire. IF...IF..IF...this is what is happening, the appeals court would review and issue an expedited order.
The only thing that doesn't add up is court is to resume at 8:30a tomorrow, per HHJP. :waitasec:
It wouldn't surprise me if someone else has suddenly "pled guilty" to this, three ring circus and all.
The judge is allowing further questioning of jurors - the defense got their way already this morning after Jose's touchy speech about his promise to ICA.
I'm not going with the motion filed - they don't have to "discuss the matter with Miss Anthony" to file a motion. So, that's off the table.
JB being sick - ain't flying either because he drove himself away. Too sick to sit in a courtroom but not sick enough to drive himself away? Nope, that aitn'y fittin'.
A plea? Could be - but we all know there is NO WAY in hello that ICA will ever plea to ANYTHING.
So what's left?
along those same veins why would they discuss the filing of an appeal with her?
I don't buy the whole Jose is sick angle. He was fine all day... smiling, smirking, giving over emotional speeches about fighting for his client. Something is going on and it isn't JB being sick. If it comes down to JB being sick... he is faking it in order to delay this. I want to hear the 911 call that took JB to the hospital... if he was that sick.
ETA: I really do hope that it isn't something really serious like a car accident or him suffering a stroke or something. As much as I despise him, I would never wish that on him. I still think it is a delay tactic... if it comes out that he is simply sick.
Richard Hornsby's been right 99.98% of the time on his calls. Just sayin'
http://blog.richardhornsby.com/2011/05/could-judge-perry-be-wrong-defense-right/
Duckin' and running now...
If his instincts are correct, we need to keep checking the appeals clerk's website. They would have to file an Interlocutory appeal.