I am irritated by the questions about what a great mom ICA was and the "amazing" bond between Caylee and her mother.
First of all, dragging her toddler in and out of various men's beds is not exactly what I would call good mothering.
Secondly, I have worked in this field (children's services) and children who are abused and neglected are frequently EXTRA affectionate and demonstrative towards their abusive parents. They KNOW that to act angry towards the parent, or to not act loving, means more punishment later. And, in reality, like almost all little children, they LOVE their parents, no matter how they've been treated. So it can look - to someone who doesn't really understand child development and child psychologically - as though the abusive parent and child have a "special connection." The child will be running to the mother, being demonstratively affectionate, responding promptly if called, etc.
I'm not saying that ICA WAS abusive (although I do find the "silent" videotaping quite concerning). But the opinions of childless 20-year-olds about ICA's mothering are basically useless.
I also feel like JB is trying to say "these incidents show what a great liar ICA is, and so she was able to lie about her child's accidental death." But if she's such a convincing liar, why should we believe the story she apparently told you?
Tink