My observations on Cindy's testimony. I was very surprised at the amount of details that went into Casey's lies. After I thought about it, I was more shocked that CA not only remembered so many details of the conversations but the dates with the details. Unless she was taking notes, with all the conversations, with all the lies, how do you remember during the conversation on this day Casey said "blah, blah, blah." Sure if the day was significant such as the 4th. But I never heard well I remember different conversations but I have no way to tell you which one happened on what day.
When Cindy said that she started sleeping with Caylee's teddy bear on June 16, 2008. One day "AFTER" the last time she saw Caylee, Cindy missed her so much that she started sleeping with her teddy bear. That is something I would think you would do AFTER you lose someone. a break-up with a boyfriend or a death, not just because they did not come home that first night.
I also thought Cindy testified she did not tell Casey:
LDB: mrs anthony we were talking about you sleeping with a teddy bear?
yes
LDB: did you discover the bear was missing?
I started sleeping with teddy that weekend and after four or five nights I noticed it was missing.
LDB: did you tell your daughter you were sleeping with teddy?
not during that time, after all of this
The pregnancy and looking for Zanny until 6 weeks ago, I thought that made the defenses point that the family denied reality until they were forced to face it.
The testimony from Cindy where they tried to paint a picture of Caylee not able to get outside or into the pool. By 3 years old, kids know how to use chairs/items to climb any place they want too. They showed the picture of the pool with chairs by it. Cindy testified that a chair sometimes blocked her bedroom slider. I just felt the SA tried so hard to use Cindy to prove there was no way Caylee accidentally drowned but NEVER considered Caylee's age and that there were other possibilities.
IMO, I feel many times the SA tries to "avoid" asking questions that might help Casey. In doing so, it makes more of an impact when the defense asks. Becasue the defense asks a yes or no to get the answer they want but don't follow it with another question. The SA then asks the follow up but it comes off as trying to "explain" away the answer the helped the defense. if the SA had just asked the question first, the SA would have followed up with the explanation so the defense does not get the impact.