- Joined
- May 21, 2013
- Messages
- 19,116
- Reaction score
- 147,709
I was watching closely and never did see him turn around. I must have missed it.BM did look and nod at the woman in the light top behind him, so maybe a daughter.
I was watching closely and never did see him turn around. I must have missed it.BM did look and nod at the woman in the light top behind him, so maybe a daughter.
He turned around the second court adjourned and said something/made a nod at them.I was watching closely and never did see him turn around. I must have missed it.
its either Mallory or Macy I could not tell from the live streamI do think that is Macy on the defense's side in the back. Yes, defense attorney just stated a victim is present in courtroom. JMO
Did I understand correctly that, since the public defender's office has reported they have a conflict, attorney David Bellar said that he and attorney Jane Byrialsen (both currently providing limited representation) would be available to be appointed (and have been in the past on other cases) as his provided attorneys? So that would provide BM with these two typically highly-compensated attorneys but on the Colorado taxpayers' dime rather than BM's.Does that mean his pro bono one has bailed out?
Wasn’t Beller the one thought to be pro bono? JMO, but never thought he was pro bono.Does that mean his pro bono one has bailed out?
As far as I know, the pro bono was speculation. The two defence attorneys that he has have limited their appearance to this arraignment imo.Does that mean his pro bono one has bailed out?
Judge - Amanda Hopkins.-I was a little late to the live stream but the following is what I got :
-Next court appearance is Sept 2nd 1:30 and yes to the live stream
-Evidently there is a conflict of interest so Barry cannot use thpue blic defender so his current lawyers anticipate they will be appointed to his case. Maybe with the addition of David Lipka who was on the live stream lisstening in - but that needs to all play out
-Melinda /Suzannes sister was lsitening in on the live stream via court webx
-The daughters used to have a victim lawyer Jane B - she is withdrawing so a new one needs to be appointed
-All Discovery has been given to D and judge with the exception of one grand jury interview which they will have in a week
-On Set 2nd -Barrys lawyer anticipateshe will be asking for a probale cause cause review -
-On Sept 2nd -Barrys lawyer anticipates they will want to review the issue of bail
- The judge seemed smart /strong and fair - I did not catch her name
- The D male lawyer is very soft spoken but knowledgable - I did not hear Jane speak
-The P - DA Anne Kelly and I believe a guy named Johnson ? - both spoke very well prepared / confident and knowledgable
Off to the races - in a much better position than last time
JMO
Judge - Amanda Hopkins.
I think this is a little different though. Barry thought he would be slick and have her go over there. What if he was having her move evidence or something? I just think since he was on house arrest and living right down the road from his old house, there should have been an understanding that he shouldn't be there, and he shouldn't send anyone else there. I mean he could have called UPS or FedEx and said hey can you deliver it to the right house.. or something. I just think Barry thought he was above the law; he showed it when he talked to LE so many times and was upset that he thought one of them was his friend. He just did whatever he wanted and SD should have known better than to go over there because this wasn't just any house and any accidental wrong delivery.I agree with Tragg. I would hazard a guess that most people who police identify as "trespassing" on someone's land based on Ring cameras and things and if they are not criminals on probation or have warrants are given a stern warning and not prosecuted. These days people hunt down their lost packages by pictures of people's front door. I totally also suspect that LE wanted to squeeze SD hoping to glean some information even though they figured out that she was simply picking up a misdelivered package for BM who knew he could not be on that property. And I imagine in most municipalities the police can handle it with a homeowner who is upset that someone unknown to them was on their property.
Still means that local LE handled it "differently" than any other case of someone walking up to a wrongly delivered package and picking it up. That's over and my guess is LE didn't get anything of interest and knew that if they actually ended up going to trial which they knew SD would ask for no jury of rational people would "convict" her of trespassing in my opinion or it would end up some sort of misdemeanor plea deal with a very low fine. In my opinion old news and a big to-do over nothing and yet another prosecution induced distraction intertwined from the job at hand which was putting together a strong case against BM.I think this is a little different though. Barry thought he would be slick and have her go over there. What if he was having her move evidence or something? I just think since he was on house arrest and living right down the road from his old house, there should have been an understanding that he shouldn't be there, and he shouldn't send anyone else there. I mean he could have called UPS or FedEx and said hey can you deliver it to the right house.. or something. I just think Barry thought he was above the law; he showed it when he talked to LE so many times and was upset that he thought one of them was his friend. He just did whatever he wanted and SD should have known better than to go over there because this wasn't just any house and any accidental wrong delivery.
They handled it differently because it was different.Still means that local LE handled it "differently" than any other case of someone walking up to a wrongly delivered package and picking it up. That's over and my guess is LE didn't get anything of interest and knew that if they actually ended up going to trial which they knew SD would ask for no jury of rational people would "convict" her of trespassing in my opinion or it would end up some sort of misdemeanor plea deal with a very low fine. In my opinion old news and a big to-do over nothing and yet another prosecution induced distraction intertwined from the job at hand which was putting together a strong case against BM.
Yes!! I think this hearing explains the long delay (7 months) between the burial site discovery and autopsy results, and the even longer 14-month span between the release of the autopsy results and indictment. This prosecution team has learned (painfully) from the mistakes of the past and prepared very carefully. Everything will be by the letter of the law, information tightly controlled and (I’m confident) they’re thoroughly prepared for the inevitable defense “games”.Lol. This is night and day difference between the first prosecution team and this one.
They’ve already done everything without being asked. Say they’re ready to move.