Mountain_Kat
Heca Firimar !
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2010
- Messages
- 13,966
- Reaction score
- 45,141
As someone sitting here all day every day, trying to plow through this testimony along with this jury, may I just say that I'm REALLY starting to get ticked off with the DT. They tell us ICA acted inappropriately after the "accidental drowning" of her daughter because she was traumatized by SA, and lives in a fantasy world (or something, I dunno) as a result of that. Now the DT springs this grief "expert" on us? FOR WHAT? Is it grief that made ICA party her butt off after Caylee "drowned" or was it SA that caused that?!
I don't know what points the DT are addressing any more, I don't know what their "theories" are any more, and quite frankly, I'm starting to feel like they are just giving us all the runaround here.
Extremely frustrating, and yes...infuriating!
I don't know what points the DT are addressing any more, I don't know what their "theories" are any more, and quite frankly, I'm starting to feel like they are just giving us all the runaround here.
Extremely frustrating, and yes...infuriating!