So so far JB /the defense has outright said:
-ICA lied to the police at Universal and in her statement (JB outright told YM on the stand they weren't disputing it if I understood him correctly)
-they do not dispute that Caylee died while in ICA's custody on or about the prosecution's timeline of June 15/16
-the 'nanny' story is a lie but she continued to tell it to everyone (statements given to the police and on video while ICA is in custody to family members support this)
They object to:
- the admission of the pics of ICA dancing and partying after the June 16th date
- the portrayal of JB in the videotapes by ICA's family members
- the distribution of erroneous legal advice through the videos to the jury
Based on the charges she has just plead guilty through testimony by her attorney to all the misdemeanor charges and perhaps based on the fact that they are not disputing that Caylee died in her care and custody counts 2 and 3 (depending what those are dileneated as for the jury)?
Am I wrong in my understanding to what has occured so far?
FIRST DEGREE MURDER 782.04(1)(A)(1) Capital Offense 06/15/2008
2. AGGRAVATED CHILD ABUSE 827.03(2) Second Degree - Felony 06/15/2008
3. AGGRAVATED MANSLAUGHTER OF A CHILD 782.07(3) First Degree - Felony 06/15/2008
4. FALSE INFO TO LEO RE MISSING PERSON OR FELONY 837.055 First Degree - Misd 06/15/2008
5. FALSE INFO TO LEO RE MISSING PERSON OR FELONY 837.055 First Degree - Misd 06/15/2008
6. FALSE INFO TO LEO RE MISSING PERSON OR FELONY 837.055 First Degree - Misd 06/15/2008
7. FALSE INFO TO LEO RE MISSING PERSON OR FELONY 837.055 First Degree - Misd 06/15/2008
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6236234
I know they are trying to pull a "bait and switch" with GA but really is it pertinent in any way, shape or form? I realize there is a lot more to go but JB (unless he changes his tactics again) has already gone this far and I am not sure if he can go back at this point...
MOO