Jose bringing up "that child was missing."
Jose is getting confused about what story he is defending, I think. He is supposed to be there for an accidental drowning, but he keeps on arguing everything else. Does anybody else know what I am talking about? I am not sure I do...but it is something...
It is like Jose really forgets what the opening statements were, what is it he is arguing? He just argues against what he can as each thing comes up, and those things do not always go with his opening statements. I guess that is his plan, rip and pull? He must be counting on that ole "the defense is not required to prove anything."
Which is great, if the prosecution does not have a solid case. In this case, we have the State telling it the way it is while Jose dances around each subject interjecting Casey latest and greatest "Hit." (ie. her lies)
Everyday, more and more I am convinced this has all been Casey. She is the CEO running the show. Oh, and I think D. Sims is fed up with ICA since she saw the jailhouse videos, and has not been as physical as we have seen happen with team member after team member. Then Ms. Sims did not do the cross regarding the subject she argued during the Frye hearings. Some have suggested that Jose wanted the "gotcha" moment, and some have suggested that Ms. Sims might have not wanted to: we don't know which is which but we do know she was not the one who did it.
This is all so crazy, it can only be Casey running the show. Well, HHJP is running the show while Casey only runs her defense.