Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
cross examination.....
:tos::tos::tos::tos:
Seriously? Would love to see that. Amazing that they can diffentiate the decompositional odour between two different mammals.
What was the basis that he said he differentiated between the two?
No other plausible explanation.
Did they say if this was found on the inside of the tire cover, or the outside?
I can find no other plausible explanation other than that (there was a human body decomposing in the trunk) to explain our findings.
Dr. Vass: If you leave here today and walk down the street you will encounter many odors...each of those odors is comprised of dozens of chemicals. A rose may have 12 chemcials that make up that fragrance. Trash may have 20 chemicals that make up that odor. There could be cross odorization (Little Bitty made this word up) between the rose and the trash. in the car sample there were 51 individual compounds. 41 of those were related to decomp. Some of the others were related to gasoline (think gas cans peeps). So they elimated those compounds. And then they elimated other chemicals from their CONTROL sample. They looked at the trash, garage air, stuff that would have been in the car already. That left 16 compunds. of those 16, 7 of those are significant. of the huge number of compounds...on a list, they paired it down to 30 (when it comes to a human being)...gasoline in the trunk confused stuff. Just because gasoline overlapped with the decomp doesn't mean that the decomp compounds are not there.
Seriously? Squirrel and human's give off a different chemical odour? What would you know.
Side note: I am not sure if the jury are going to like this cross-examination of Vaas.