2011.06.16 TRIAL Day Twenty (Afternoon Session)

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Q47 - results, no presence of blood (car seat)
Q48 - Steering Wheel Cover no biological items
 
I read a post earlier today that the woman currently testifying had dinner with Baez last night. Don't know who reported it, but apparently they were seen. This woman is an employee of the FBI, correct? Since when is it okay for a government employee to accept any gratuity from anyone involved in a case in which she is testifying?????? Even if she paid for her own dinner, it is the perception that is objectionable. I am a retired state employee in HR, and in my career, this would never have been allowed.

Well earlier JB referenced asking this witness a question last night ???
 
This witness is annoying to me. All her side comments and wanting to explain.....

absolutely - Im getting the feeling that she and Baez are friends - I dont get the feeling that shes impartial
 
JB is exhibiting some sort of strange flirtatious behavior that is inducing increasing symptoms of nausea in me.
 
When will this be over? The trial? Please and thanks.

As Ws'er technicalconfusion posted this morning "10 years, 8 days". And at the rate we are going I almost tend to believe that....:floorlaugh:
 
My Mom is rolling in her grave watching him! Mom worked for a judge for 14 years.
 
PLEASE review this forum thoroughly before posting today:



:tos: Here they are!



PLEASE avoid posts that are:

- bashing the defendant's looks or grooming, in words or through visual images

- using derogatory or demeaning terms to refer to players in this case

- snarky to fellow WSers

- otherwise sending the thread off-topic.


Posters who continue to ignore the TOS or the Rules of Etiquette will find themselves on a Time Out.

If you come across a post that violates TOS or the Rules of Etiquette, or that is clearly taking the thread off-topic, the appropriate response is to hit the red triangle "Alert" button, leave a message for our mods, and move on. Please do not quote the offending post or comment upon it in any way. The mods are equipped with brooms and light sabers and will do everything in their power to make sure that WS continues to be the premier true-crime forum on the Web.

Thank you to the many posters who have helped the mods by alerting on questionable posts these last days.


bumping up
 
Tweet said no other witnesses waiting...guess this witness will be here all day..

No twelve jurors are going to give Casey one free murder.


I find it hard to believe that even JB could keep her on the stand all day.


I'm betting next witness is already in the courtroom.
 
How does have dinner = accept gratuity?

I just explained why. If he paid for dinner, that's a no-no. If she paid for her own, it's still the perception to the public that's important. That is not acceptable ethically for any government employee.
 
Tweet said no other witnesses waiting...guess this witness will be here all day..

No twelve jurors are going to give Casey one free murder.

Can this really go on for another 3 hours!!??? EEK! I won't make it!
 
Did Lee Anthony ever claim to have done the chloroform and other internet searches?
Someone I know said that he did, I don't recall that.
 
This witness is annoying to me. All her side comments and wanting to explain.....

The prosecution witnesses were aloud to elaborate and explain even when the DT was asking a yes or no question. Shouldn't be any difference made between sides.
 
I'm going to try to clarify a few things so hopefully we are a little clearer about what is okay to post in this thread and what is to be saved for Sidebar. Hope this helps. :)

Re: posting Tweets - Previously we have requested that all tweets be restricted from this thread and posted in the Twitter thread. Posting single tweets from anyone inside the courroom that can shed light on what we are unable to see via our monitors are fine to post here. (note: repetitive, multiple posts of the same tweet will be removed at mod discretion so they do not clog up the thread.) Most all of these will be from MSM reporters - I really can't think of any exceptions off of the top of my head. If they can tell us how jurors are reacting, that is huge, relevant info and we need to see it here. I ask that those of you who do post tweets still include them in the Twitter thread because we have many members who log in for a quick update and depend solely on that thread.


Re: posting about the demeanor of the defendant or witnesses -
This is the deal:
It is perfectly fine to post FACTS & OBSERVATIONS about their demeanor. (e.g., Casey is emotionless; Casey is giggling while listening to this testimony, etc...)

It is the "Casey's blouse is so low cut she must be trying to get the attention of Juror #11, the George Clooney look-a-like"; "eyebrows and hair" ('nuff said :aktion1:). Bottom line, if it doesn't add anything to understanding what is going on during TRIAL, then save these comments and post them in the Sidebar. Express those sentiments there. (Remember! TOS and Rules of Etiquette still apply in Sidebar: no namecalling, bashing and derogatory remarks simply intended to be snarky.)


Okay, I hope that helps clarify a few things.
bumping up
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
126
Guests online
233
Total visitors
359

Forum statistics

Threads
609,512
Messages
18,255,158
Members
234,678
Latest member
NavyGirl75
Back
Top