2011.06.16 TRIAL Day Twenty (Afternoon Session)

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.

DT calls Cary Oien....section chief FBI lab unit...3 previous positons w/FBI - just over 15 years w/FBI - Bach in Biology...Masters in Emtomology.....hair and fiber examiner over 1 year training reading, microscope hair and fiber samples compare hair and fibers to known samples.....complete training program qualified as examiner for hair and fibers....admit as expert in hair and fiber...

Sept 2008 - worked unit chief of trace evidence unit- managing all trace unit personnel - asked to conduct exam on this case....on this submission of evidence report 9/12/08 - primary examiner Ms. Lowe not present in lab....he had an opportunity to conduct evidence exam so evidence keep flowing- shovel - Q-46 received in and minerologic exam...stickers on the item...hold trace evidence - hair and fiber took a look - with mineralology
examiner - mounted hair and fibers on glass microscope slide - one sticker from shaft of shovel found 1/4" long caucasion hair - limited size - fragment of hair....submitted to mitochondrial dna for subsequent analysis....do not know results....section chief....ensure QA within lab - one of the aspects of job....each unit has QA personnel for lab and each unit follows ....accredited ASCLAB lab - process criteria established by ISO - international standard organization.

ASCLAD lab had all criteria - policy procedure - maintain and calibrate equipment - broad reaching accredation program - volunteer inspector or assessor come in to assess you .....reserach lab have to go thru same criteria?
If a lab not accredited by ASCLAD or another organization - are they on their own or are they monitored? (object- sidebar)




 
JB using this witness to try to discredit Dr. Vass. :(
 
May be helpful for those who haven't read it...the discovery about the sticker residue, stickers found in ICA's room. We've heard testimony from one FBI examiner who saw it. I imagine we will hear from the 2nd one in the states rebuttal.
 
PLEASE review this forum thoroughly before posting today:



:tos: Here they are!



PLEASE avoid posts that are:

- bashing the defendant's looks or grooming, in words or through visual images

- using derogatory or demeaning terms to refer to players in this case

- snarky to fellow WSers

- otherwise sending the thread off-topic.


Posters who continue to ignore the TOS or the Rules of Etiquette will find themselves on a Time Out.

If you come across a post that violates TOS or the Rules of Etiquette, or that is clearly taking the thread off-topic, the appropriate response is to hit the red triangle "Alert" button, leave a message for our mods, and move on. Please do not quote the offending post or comment upon it in any way. The mods are equipped with brooms and light sabers and will do everything in their power to make sure that WS continues to be the premier true-crime forum on the Web.

Thank you to the many posters who have helped the mods by alerting on questionable posts these last days.

:rocker:come on guys..... read this again before posting! and no you may not SEE the posts that violate this because they are being dealt with... also please make sure to go back and review the mod stickie on the forum about the defense is up.... you must read and thank before posting here. by reading and thanking it you have read and understood the rules right?

thanks!
 
Any opinions on whether Caylee was conscious or unconscious when her mother wrapped her little face in duct tape?
 
Regarding 911 call yesterday- George today in court says he will not comment.

by cfnews13casey via twitter at 3:14 PM

Can someone point me in a direction to what this is in reference too?

PM me or link please!
 
And her lawyer's opening statement.

Baez told the jury that KC was present when Caylee drowned on the 16th.

It doesn't matter that it's not evidence, the jury remembers him saying that, yet he's done all in his power to distance KC from Caylee's body when he should be putting on a defense that explains his opening statement.

So far, he's made very little headway today. KC deserves better than this. He's used her to get his mug on TV and get famous, then he starts off with a limp, meaningless defense. I'm disgusted.

I feel he doesn't care if she's convicted, he got what he wanted.

Actually, juries are instructed that they are not to regard what is said in OS as 'evidence'. I agree with you, she's got bad representation but she's not a celebrity (in like how we think of one) to afford a 'dream' team or else this might be a different trial.

There is a reason why guys like OJ, MJ and that baretta guy (forgot the name) got off and it wasn't just because the jury wasn't any good. What do they all have in common?
 
It is always 5 o'clock somewhere right??? It's only 1:30 here but it might be time for happy hour ....

This is excruciating.
 
*advertiser censored*-clad:floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh:
 
Huh? Is JB trying to get this FBI guy to say something about Dr. Vass's research lab?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
126
Guests online
1,857
Total visitors
1,983

Forum statistics

Threads
601,311
Messages
18,122,515
Members
231,001
Latest member
SBMonsterFighter
Back
Top