2011.06.18 TRIAL Day Twenty-two (Morning Session Only)

[Bon]

ITA. Someone is lying, JB or the witness...wonder which one.

IMO

I'll answer that one for you, JB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[grandmaj]

Quite ironic that we were here this morning to talk about a possible rule of sequestration.

 

[TortillaChip]

Hah, finally. The judge was very clear in the beginning. He set deadlines. And JB has had a lot of time to do this.

 

[BigFatMommyDog]

JB is digging deeper and deeper.

give him Burner's shovel!

 

[Apex-mom]

WOW. HHJP is furious.

 

[Serjen]

Possible violations of rule of sequestration? Is that what JP said they met at 8:30 for? Is that about someone on the jury?? I'm so confused now...

 

[bobloblaw]

possible violation of the rule of sequestration? Wow, anyone heard about this?

 

[SarahEcho]

I really appreciate the common sense of this judge in trying to keep both sides from going into circus mode.

 

[Amster]

CM is gearing up to scream "mistrial"!!!

 

[PalmettoGirl]

HHJP-it appears to me this was quite intentional. It was not an inadvertant slip.

 

[MissDiva]

Intentional, not inadvertent slip, per the judge's opinion.

 

[21merc7]

I think HHJP stayed up looking up how to handle these issues

 

[andalso]

My jaw is on the floor! WOW!

 

[What'sThatClue]

HHJP: This was not some inadvertent slip...

 

[CementPond]

Judge says it appears intentional.

 

[Cabin girl]

HHJP this was quite intentional

 

[ZsaZsa]

HHJP cannot ever give JB the azzkicking he needs without telling him that JA probably needed one too!
We know who the dirty player is in this room and it's not JA...

 

[Velouria]

Now i see why JB is ICA's lawyer...they share the same 'ideals': When caught in a lie, blame anyone and everyone else but yourself.

Serjen, I need this on a t-shirt. :clap:

 

[Bon]

Both sides have engaged in game playing!

HHJP is pizzed off beyond belief.

I don't get how JP says both sides......so not true, IMO!

 

[sleutherontheside]

it's ironic we were supposed to be here at 8:30 to discuss a violation of the rule of sequestration.