The DT has not asked for a mistrial over this.........
They will at the end of the day.
The DT has not asked for a mistrial over this.........
The DT has not asked for a mistrial over this.........
So are you saying it's ok that JA does? JA knows very well that Defendant has no burden to test anything - that question was to inflame the fury with Inference that they had to or should have.
Talking in the hallway: #JoseBaez , #cindyanthony and Cindy's attorney, Mark Lippman. Curious.
by stevehelling via twitter at 1:36 PM
Possible mistrial? Someone please explain.
Witness was asked if he is able to replicate Dr. Vass's results, and JA thinks it opened the door for him to ask why he didn't try. DS objects because it shifts the burden of proof to the defense implying that they should have run the tests and she was just trying to point out that the tests were run according to no protocol the witness is aware of and the reports give insufficient information to replicate.
Judge saying that it's a fine line here and let's recess.
The parties quoted caselaw, Overton and Hayes I think.
I will cry if a mistrial goes down. Especially if the SA's fault.
They will at the end of the day.
Shouldnt there be consequences for lawyers who constanly try to get a mistrial by messing up on purpose? Why are they allowed to do this?
I thought double jeopardy only applied when someone had actually been aquitted....that they could never ever be tried again for that same crime. No?
Jose is getting paid by Florida tax payers...make no mistake
It always amazes me how quickly the Judge can come up with other case references off the top of his head hehe